Public Input Session For Dispatch Study
Speakers are labeled SPEAKER_N. This transcript is machine-generated.
Just Okay, I'd like to start the public input session for the uh dispatch study. Um first I'd like to introduce everyone to Sher Bush from ADCOM. She is uh the individual that was assigned to this project from ADCOM. Um we are happy to have her here. Um so this is an opportunity for residents. it is on. Um this is an opportunity for residents to come up and share with her any information, feedback, but it is specific to the dispatching department. U and so we want to keep that focus. This isn't about New London police. This isn't about New London fire. This isn't about the ambulance. This is truly about the dispatching function within the town. Um, and so she is here to take notes. She is here to intake feedback information that folks have. Um, and then she will take that back as part of all the information gathering that she is doing while she's here over the next few days um, to help her pull together recommendations. So, I've got this list here of folks who have signed in. BB and Janet, I know that you had a chance individually to be interviewed earlier today by Sher. anything that you wanted to sh any additional thoughts? Great. Colin Beasley, if you do do you have anything that you wanted to share, questions, comments? Um, and just ask that when you come up to the mic, turn it on and then just announce your name, please. >> Colonel Beasley, I'm a resident. Sherry, thanks for joining us. Uh, I have questions actually more than comments. Uh, and I have something I want to hand over to you at the end of my my discussion. uh and I don't know whether you can answer the question so I guess you can get back to us if you can't. uh what for number one what are the operations and cost data you're looking at in your analysis and I'm specifically thinking through on KPIs standards or reports are being generated uh things of that >> I didn't catch all that you said KPIs and wells did you say >> standards for dispatching function uh what is the R the second question is what is the RFI referenced in your response to the town's RFP. That's been a question we've been asking on various meetings. Do you have an answer to that? What is the RFI? >> What is in it? What ask for? >> So, in your response to the town's RFP. Uh you mentioned that you were going to conduct an RFI. >> What are you going to do? What is the RFI going to be seeking? Uh well, I think in general, at least what it sounds like, what you're saying is that that process of discovery. Um the RFI is but one document of that and it's just a list of documents that if they have them, we would appreciate them sharing so that we can review them, past reports, budgetary information, things of that nature. Um we also provided to them a survey that collects demographics, statistics, technology inventory, things of that nature. Um those are things that internally we've talked about it that there are certain parts of those that could be made public. Um obviously some redaction for security purposes like their technology and things like that. Um but those are two different >> instruments tools that we've provided that we've asked for response from. >> Um they just received those within the past two weeks. Um the survey I believe has been completed. Um I am here for the first time today >> and have some conducted some interviews and we'll conduct some more tomorrow. That part of it is listening sessions which this is one of them. >> Um where just uh sit down with specific stakeholders um the chief the select men sat in the dispatch center for a few hours today. U went over to Sunipe make sure I say it right um and spoke with the police chief and the fire chief over there. um tomorrow will be more of the same of engaging stakeholders and listening to what their thoughts are about the options that are in front of New London. So the RFI as the way if I understood you correctly you're describing it is the process and and we stakeholder engagement discovery. Okay. Data collection. Okay. >> So we're in the midst of that now. Um and it will all be used to create the analysis. >> Okay. >> Okay. So I'm that's fine. I I I appreciate the context now. I was misunderstanding when you had referenced the RFI that I had the impression you you were going to issue a request for information to some party or parties. Um, >> no, it's to the town of New London. >> Okay. >> Yes. >> Um, what what alternative dispatch centers are you going to be looking at in your four scenario analysis? >> Um, and I'll depend on you to correct me if I get this wrong. Um, we're looking specifically at whether there should be a change, whether that is New London becomes its own independent without serving any towns dispatch center. Uh, what if New London and the towns went to another dispatch center? And that could be a split. It doesn't have to be everybody packs up and goes to one town. Excuse me. And also if everything remains the same. So for the scenario where New London would go somewhere else, what are you looking at the alternative dispatch centers in New in New Hampshire that we could go to and getting specific data on them? >> Uh no, that's not the step that you're at right now. It's what would it take for you to move? What would be the impact on the town of New London if you were to move? And as we've discovered here today and and certainly knew ahead of time, it's more than just the town. It's the other towns that are served. the impact, what would have to happen in order for those changes to be made in order for you to go anywhere, what would have to happen both operationally, technologically, the infrastructure, and the people. >> So, I I I I might be I might be um misunderstanding the intention here. So I I I was understanding that the study was going to offer up to the town um the impact associated with the financials and the operations performance on those four alternatives. So it's not about what is the impact of what is it going to take to move but what are those options and what are the alternative cost and operations parameters for those options. So if we were going to move to handover, what does handover cost per month or per year versus what we charge ourselves per year? How does handover operate from a performance point of view annually on their KPIs versus our KPIs? It is with that information the town can decide whether it makes any sense to move. Are we going to get that kind of information from you? At a high level, the comparables, yes, but not a deep dive because that's a a whole other effort and it's pretty large effort. Normally, you want to study internally what needs to change here or what should change or what should not change. What are the investments that have been made here before you start looking elsewhere? And I understand that your alternatives could be vast. You could split every town to a different 911 center in different parts of the state if you wanted to. Technically, you could. The biggest hurdle that you guys have to get past would be how to connect back to this area. And I don't think it's speaking out of school to talk about your radio system. Um, so that's something we have to look at. What would that take? Because that is tied to the earth. It's tied to here. and the only way someone else could have access to it is to connect to it to then speak to your response agencies. So those are the types of things and costs that we're looking at right now. So if you were to make a change, what would that look like? What would that impact be no matter what the change is? >> I don't know how the town is going to understand implication if we don't get data on the other centers. So when you say you're going to come come at it from a higher level, what does that mean? Are you going to look at handover? >> You use the example of handover. We're not able to go to handover and sit down with those people, examine their operations, examine their budgetary and all of that. We can make a phone call and talk to them and say, "So, what is the process? If you were to take on another PAP, what would that fee structure potentially look like?" We can do that, but we need to have exactly where you want to look. And the problem that you have is you could look in 10 15 other directions. >> So I Okay, I I I don't think this is going to get what we want. As an FYI, my own personal opinion. Um and we could talk forever and I I'll leave it to other people to come up and maybe we can talk afterwards. I I think that um trying to understand what the annual charge would be for the scenarios that we outlined in the RFP and and one of those scenarios might be our going to an alternative center. The other one was to split and I believe there is one location that offers fire department only. I don't recall the name of it. I'm sure that somebody here does. Um so that information could be made available from that organization as to what they would charge us and how they would perform their function. So we can compare that charge with a handover or another alternative. And I would frankly leverage when you take a look at uh I would leverage the uh New Hampshire North count north country interoperability uh uh consortium. No >> consortium. >> Consortium. Thank you. um >> you're already part of that right now, >> right? So there's multitude of of uh dispatch centers that are part of that consortium. So uh looking at those locations would minimize the sort of cost we need to incur because we're using the same technology base and using that same platform should allow for a transition to be much more easy. So I would hope that we'd get out of this analysis some assessment of what centers have that platform. What are the costs that those centers would charge us if we were to go to those centers? How do those centers behave on an operations performance point of view versus our center? And with that information, we can then have the conversation about do the alternatives come across at a less at at a equal or or or less cost at a equal or better performance. That's what I would hope come out of the study. Do you think that's a possibility that will come out of this? >> At this first stage, I don't think to the depth that you're hoping that it would. The first stage really needs to consider the things that aren't on your list and that is internal to New London and the towns that it serves. So that's the first phase is what is the what would have to happen internally to the relationships, the technology, the infrastructure and the operations in order to make any change. What would that look like? How would that go down? What might that cost? The next phase is if you decide, well, I think we should look outside of this even after we've studied this part of it and then say, "Okay, specifically we want to go to Hanover. Who wants to go to Hanover? Okay, we've got three towns including New London that wants to go there." And then you go to Hanover and you say, "This is the situation we have. We have this body of work. We have this technology limitations. The CAD part is actually and frankly going to be one of your easiest parts because there is this consortium. >> Correct. >> But there's other technologies that bear the only way that the police department knows where to go >> is getting on a radio system and talking to them. >> Right. >> Correct. So that part right there is a huge cost if you were to change anything to do with your radio system, letting someone else have connectivity to it, letting someone else use it. All of those require reprogramming, possibly different sites, different equipment. So, those are things that we lay out as here's your cost considerations and what they might cost you no matter what your change is. >> So, uh will your cost when you lay out the cost um are you going to be talking about a range of cost or are you going to have definitive cost because you know it might cost us something. It might not cost us anything. So you can lay out >> it's going to cost you something whether it's dollars or something else. You could have operational disruption. >> Yeah. Well, >> you could have loss of situational awareness. You have loss of coordinated resources. So any change is going to cost you something. And the idea is do you balance that with what you think you're going to gain? What is it you're trying to fix? What is it that you're trying to gain out of this? >> But if you haven't got the analysis done as to what your alternatives are, you don't know how to balance that against the gain. Candidly, I think that we should be doing the reverse of what you're suggesting. We should be understanding what would be the cost and operations advantage or disadvantage associated with moving to another site. The only way to figure that out is by understanding what those other sites offer for cost. And if it if it proves at a financial level, high level, that it makes sense either performance-wise or financially to move dispatch somewhere else. Then you go down the deeper level and say what would it take to move? >> Well, you're talking about two different sets of costs here. Yeah. There is the cost of providing a service. Yeah. Which is what you're talking about. Hey, uh, dispatch centers A, B, and C. What do you charge correct to provide the service? Correct. But then there has to be prep done on your >> No, I understand that. Right. That's the transition technology, right? Exactly. There's capital costs involved. There's transition costs involved. There's operational considerations for staff. um and the service levels can be impacted. So that part of it, if you're not 100% on what that is and what that would take and what the impact of a change would be on those things, then knowing that you could go somewhere else for some other cost, that's not the full cost. >> No, I appreciate that. I alls I'm saying is I believe I we're it's fine. I mean, it is what it is. It's going to be the result of what you do. I believe understanding the cost of the alternatives provides you with a framework. I'll give you an example. >> Sorry, we have only 45 more minutes and a number of folks. So, I want to make sure >> ask other questions then and then if other if there's more time then I'll be happy to get up and talk about it again. Um, who are you interviewing for your interviews that you're here for? Who? And later on, I guess you're going to do interviews on the phone. >> Exactly. Who you interviewing? uh executive leadership so of the agencies and of the towns. Um we've spent time in and I will tomorrow again in the actual dispatch center. Um not only observing and talking to them because they're the most impacted group of stakeholders here as a staff inside the center but seeing how they operate, what their workflows are, uh where their sticking points are, their pain points are and learning about how they use the tools which is the technology. and then also observing firsthand what that service is. >> Are you interviewing anybody down below in the organizations? >> Are you gonna interview? >> We have a focus group scheduled for tomorrow for any dispatch staff that we've missed. >> Um we have the this public meeting. We have another meeting tomorrow evening. I probably should let Ashley speak. >> Yeah. No, no, you're right. We do have the um uh meeting tomorrow with the current dispatch staff. We have two uh staff from other towns coming tomorrow night to be interviewed by Sherry. She will conduct the remainder of the interviews via phone with those other entities that weren't able to be here in person. >> Are we interviewing anyone in the Northern Fire Department or the Fire Ward? >> Sorry. >> Are we interviewing anybody on the New London Fire Department or Fire Awards? >> Yes. Tomorrow night. >> Tomorrow night. >> Yep. >> Okay. Um, will we will we be having additional feedback sessions on the study? This is it. >> This is it. >> Okay. Okay. Uh, I'll leave the mic to someone else and if there's time afterwards, I'll continue my conversation if that's okay. And, uh, Sher, I'd like to leave you with a presentation. Uh, I crafted this presentation. It's probably two years ago now. uh it provides with a high level assessment of the financials and operations data and I would appreciate you taking a look at this putting into your record and reflecting on it and perhaps responding to it in your respon in your report. Okay. >> Name, number, email address are all there. Feel free. Okay. Thank you so much. Lou Bodha. >> Good afternoon. Um I'm Lubon. I'm your emergency management director and um I'm here to bring some um you know some items that impact the presence of dispatch in the town of New London. And I will only do it I I will limit myself to the effect that it has on emergency management. First, the purpose of emergency management in a town is to coordinate activities with all stakeholders in the town with issues of public safety, visav disasters and emergencies. We have an e a local emergency operations plan that details in order of priority the threats that a town uh may or may not face. In this town, there's one event and I will speak to that that may bring the town to its knees and it's already happened twice which is a severe ice storm. A severe ice storm has twice basically closed down the town. We came fairly close uh this past winter uh when an ice storm threatened to basically disrupt all the town activities. A dispatch center, it is the key, it is the core around which all those activities revolve. because of staffing. We are, as you may know, we're in the transition in in a transition from a fully volunteer to a hybrid fire department. We just do not have the the staffing for there to be uh full-time firefighters in the emergency operations center. Once we activate the emergency operations center, pretty much the only ones that you'll find in the emergency operations center are going to be the town administrator and myself. Most other towns, most other places from the size of New London on up will have dedicated people inside of the emergency uh the emergency center to coordinate activities and to lies with the state and federal government in matters affecting that that particular event. We do not have the staffing either in fire or police or ambulance or mass scare uh to in order to do that in an event such as happened in 2008 would be of such magnitude that it would create uh what we call emergency support functions. The activations of these emergency support functions almost fully. Um and um the last time that we the the the the one that we came close and uh Ashley and I were in the fire department, uh the re the the requests for assistance, the request for information, the visav uh organization that we had to that we had to generate immediately was only possible due to the presence of a coordinated wellestablished dispatch center that may be a that could be the communications between an emergency operation center and the field. Not only that, they would give us the essential elements of information the to be able for us to translate to requests to and from the state. The state is hungry for information because in in a case of the activation of an emergency operation center, they want to know what's going on. The governor wants to know know what's going on. The state police wants to know what's going on and as a result they're going to be calling us every five minutes with updates with requests from updates. They want to know what streets are closed. They want to know uh the the status of our powers uh of our power system. We the emergency operation center needs to coordinate quite closely with Eversource. There is a myriad of uh requests for information in an event such as an ice major ice storm that we have to suffice with two people. It is absolutely impossible. And I would be and I'm not uh frugal when I tell you that the lack of action that would be precipitated by the absence of a wellestablished dispatch center could result in damage to property or perhaps even the loss of life. when you need people, when you need the the um the expertise of the ambulance service, the hospital, the police, fire, when you have multiple trees down, when you have when you have power disruption, you need a well-coordinated service. So I would I would be and and and I I have absolutely no qualms telling you that um the dispatch center it is an essential element of the emergency management process in this town. That is why it is in the emergency operations center. That's why I consider to be a lifesaver and a need for this community. Do you have any questions? Thank you. Tom Carly. Do you have >> Tom Carly? I'm a resident in London. Um I think the people that were involved in giving input and drafting the RFP. Um we're pretty adamant that there needed to be robust financial analysis including a comparison of New London's dispatch cost to a peer group of towns. How much could would would we save if we went to Hanover or Marramac County or whatever. And the the um the big bogey which people don't want to talk about is if we get a new police um station, we're going to dump five to six million dollars into the dispatch operation. Um which seems to me you put all the risk on the taxpayers in New London. We operate under one-year contracts. We should have a five or 10 year contracts. Um, I just find it amazing that Handover has risen to servicing 26 towns. We have dropped from 11 to four. Handover is obviously doing something right. They've cut over 26 different towns. This is not rocket scientist stuff. And they they have to deal with that's all the issues that that um were just brought up about ice storms and all that. So, I just think absent a robust financial analysis, the select board will not be in a position to make a decision on anything. We'll have wasted $30,000. And I think we're pretty adamant that we needed to get this. And I mean, this is my greatest nightmare confirmed. And, you know, I just we're wasting 30 grand. Thanks, >> Bob Bowers. Did you have anything that you wanted? >> Bob, you dropped a paper. Did you need that? Okay. >> My name is Bob Bowers. I'm a resident of New London. Um, I came tonight to try to get more information and understanding and thought I had somewhat of an understanding and listening to some of the questions going on. I'm not sure I do. Um, but I got the contract and read it and the first paragraph talks about what you're going to do. The rest is, pardon me, boilerplate. Um, I had thought, and correct me that it sounds like you're not doing this. I had thought that the idea was to look at what the current operation with the towns we have currently costs. What it might cost in future years because of operational increases. What it might cost because you had to make new capital improvements and you now got a piece of paper that says this is what it costs. Then you would compare that with if you went to a regional center. And I understand now a lot goes in that I hadn't really thought about about analyzing what that kind of move would take. Um but as a broad statement I had thought it was going to be what would it cost for the town of New London and I understand there's a relating issue with the other four towns. What would it cost the town of New London to go to a regional system? In other words, what would they charge us the way we charge Wilmet? You would then have a cost basis for regional, cost basis for current operational. You would probably have to add in the cost of how do you make that work? And you've now got to cross comparisons. You would then say, "All right, what do we have for the pros and cons of the current system? What do you have for the pros and cons of a regional system?" And you make a little list, pros and cons. And that can then be analyzed without needing a recommendation, which I'm you're probably going to do, but you don't need to. The selectman and the public can say, "Here's what it costs. Here's what it costs. Here's the good things about this. Good things about this. Bad. bad. You now have a basis for making a rational decision on what looks like might work best. Um, for various reasons when you came and talked in the interview process, um, a couple things stood out. Three things stood out for me. One was you don't make the decision based on cost. And I interpreted that to mean cost alone because cost will have a impact for a tax raising entity on what they do. That's why Wilmet doesn't have their own dispatch system. They use us. So cost has an effect, but it shouldn't be the overriding concern. You also mentioned at that point that a regional system provided what it sounds like Lou was talking about um a broader background of people and numbers of people so that with our dispatch in an ice storm emergency you've got problems with the number of people in a regional if we're the only one being hit for example instead of everybody you've got more people that can step in and cover all the calls that come in. As I understand it, though I don't think you mentioned this, you probably have better trained people because you've got a bigger purse to pay people to have better training. You've got that kind of thing so you can respond better. That's a pro. Now, there's a lot of pros that would be for this as well, but looking at those things, um, you're talking a lot about getting a lot of the data for next steps, but I'll I'll put it this way. I I send out a newsletter to a number of people every month and and I wanted to say what we're going to do and I wanted to understand it and that's what I thought I was going to say but it sounds like you're not going to do that. Is that correct? >> I think we're talking about a couple of different things. No, I understand. Yeah. >> Yeah. Okay. >> Well, yeah. So, >> are are you saying yes, I'm correct in the analysis I laid out for you, or are you saying I'm incorrect? Are you going to do a this is how much it costs currently and in the future? This is how much it costs if you go to the regional adding in the cost of the transfer over. Are you going to have those two things? >> Are you going to have a list of the good points of a regional and the bad points of a regional and the good points of keeping it the way it is? And I understand you could have New London alone, but I got convinced that that probably didn't make a lot of sense. look at what we have and continue it or regional. So you're going to do the pros and cons, the costs of current operations into the future, costs of regional with added costs of connecting and then pros and cons. You will be doing that. >> Okay? and and and I have trouble understanding language that shows up, but the scope of work is that first paragraph that lists a whole bunch of things that are being done. One, two, and three will take three to five months. So that's your scope of work, that one paragraph. >> Yeah. >> Yeah. >> Okay. >> Okay. And then one reason I'm confused is that scope of work. Nowhere mentions anywhere what I just described as cost, cost, pros, cons. But that's what you'll be doing. We adapt our analysis and our >> Oh, no. I I I I didn't mean to be insulting or anything. I just the rest of the language I could pretty much skim and didn't tell me anything about what you were doing in this contract. Yeah, I know you're going to do a a deeper analysis and lay it out on an individual basis. I understand that. Yeah. Okay. >> Okay. >> Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. >> Okay. >> Yeah. >> Yeah. >> Okay. >> Yeah. Okay. Okay. >> Okay. >> That that that's true. But the start point is New London. I think >> Yeah. Yeah. That's the sort of thing I mean by pros and cons. It's it's not but if if I being a layman that can't understand things sometimes the older I get the less I can >> will I will I be able to read your report and say ah I want to stay where we are because of these things or >> that's what >> okay Okay. >> Yeah. >> Okay. >> I'm not going to listen to your recommendation. >> Okay. So, as long as I understand that goal, I guess that's what I'm going to say in my newsletter that you're headed toward what I think is the right goal. Appreciate it. Thank you very much. >> Ed Anderson. >> Good evening. Um, when I heard about this taking place tonight, I thought it would be important to come by and share something that not a lot of people have, and that's the amount of history that I have here with the New London Dispatch. I originally came to the town of New London back in around 1993 where I joined the New London Police Cadet program and then I was immediately hired as a dispatcher. So I literally lived with dispatch when we were in the basement below you through growing from 1993 to 2001 to the changeover where we came upstairs um to when I retired back in 2000. I can go on for hours of reasons to support um keeping the dispatch center here. There's not enough time to go over that. But I thought it would be important to bring up just some things that stood out for me uh this evening. Uh one is I was able and fortunate enough to live through the 1998 and 2008 ice storms. So I know what the importance was of having a dispatch center here and how it the amount of calls for service that came in and the importance of having the dispatch center manned. We I think we're running two to three dispatchers around the clock down here working shifts. Um all the way up to the importance of the shared communities that we have. The town in New London is in the middle of what I call the X. It's the X of nowhere and the X of everything where from Franklin to Claremont um Burlington, Vermont to Methuan and everything seems to end up in this community. So in 2014, I went through a survey about uh moving dispatch out. This is the second time I guess that this is coming forward. And just a couple things I'll point out about that as I continue is we had looked at handover as well as Marramat County. Uh Marramat County dispatch at that point if it was going forward is one of the issues that seemed to be the best uh for us. But something And it's a small thing, but an important thing that stood out to me was Marramac County said, "When we take over your dispatch center, we're taking over your radio frequencies. You're not getting them back, and we're taking over all your equipment." The minute we take that, we have a lot, hundreds and hundreds of thousands of dollars worth of equipment, radios, and towers. That was a big fear to say, "What if this doesn't work well a year from now? We've lost our radio frequencies. they're not giving them back because with narrow banding, uh, frequencies were harder and harder to get. Uh, another thing that note that I pointed out was if you move dispatch for cost savings, I'm hoping what you look into is what you're going to have to add to the police department. The Atlanta Police Department cannot run with an empty seat in front of that window. We're a 24-hour police department, seven days a week with a full-time hospital and a full-time college. You're not going to be able to leave a single officer out here on a midnight shift. I was in a horrific fight at the college. Um, a gentleman trying to remove my firearm. I ended up really badly damaging my back. And what saved my life was the fact that the dispatcher in there knew that we had a bail commissioner dealing with an arrest that I had. And that dispatcher had the sense to call, his name is Cal Pressman and say, "The sergeant's in a really bad fight. He needs help." If that was Marramat County or handover, they're not going to have that type of knowledge or even think outside the box like that. If it was not for Cal coming over to help me that night, I probably would not be here. I ended up with a life sentence of a bad back. He ended up with a three-year prison sentence. I was dispatching one night. We had an officer in a fight on 103A and of the craziest thing out of it a few years later, the one person that happened to be here that I called out was a bail commissioner who was the closest person I had to go on a 103A to help the officer. Uh, a dispatch elsewhere is not going to have that. Then you go into many things like when you're dealing with one officer on the road, how many times do you want that officer to come off the road to come in to take reports of stuff that doesn't need to be addressed with. Now, number two, if you do have an officer on, we're the only 247 department miles around here. If what I was presenting when I was at that time the chief was I'm not going to stick one officer out here by himself at night with nobody um nobody in in the police department, nobody to help when they're downstairs in the booking room. So why don't you look at adding two more police officers so you can have two police officers out. Average police officer now has to be running well over $100,000 with health insurance and benefits is what I'm guessing. Probably 110,000 maybe maybe even more with health insurance. So, when you're talking about a dispatch center that's costing $600,000 that you're getting money back from other towns, I would hope that somebody would add into the added personnel that you're going to need for somebody to still sit at that window. You're still going to want to have a daily dispatcher to help you with those calls. What are you going to do for the safety of the officer on the midnights? I hope you're not going to leave them here working alone by themselves downstairs in a booking room hoping that 80 miles away somebody's watching the monitor to see if the officer isn't an issue. And an example that you could look at is Newport within the past two years had an officer being attacked and almost choked out. The person that saved that Newport officer's life was a dispatcher. Um, and that was one of the big things about uh changing how if you ever get a different PD, how I was going to change things there. Um, we are always forgotten by Marramat County. We have a sheriff's department. Calling a sheriff to come down here, which I'm not bashing the sheriff's department, but I'm just saying calling a Marramat County Sheriff's Department is like asking them to go to Pittsburgh or asking them to travel here. It is such a far distance away to get help. Um, so when you're in another dispatch, you lose the continuity of your core group of people. Um, I understand somebody said here handover has to be doing something right and they've added, you know, all these departments, but to handover, we're going to be the furthest one south. That that that's a that's a big distance for them to be addressing. Uh, just trying to look here. uh examples of how our dispatch pulled together. Um I was sitting home one night. We had a little mini micro burst come into town. Within 10 minutes, we had 84 open 911 calls. 84 calls for service was sitting on that computer. And I think the chief can look that up. We were able to get people into the dispatch center. I was one of them person sitting there. One of us was dispatching on a toilet with a phone because that's why it's there. But we were able to get those people in here and handle that. I don't know if in the matter of a minute, however large the station was up there, if they're dealing with ice storms or mini bursts and it affects other areas just outside of New London, I don't think you're going to get the response that they got from here. Another wonderful thing that we did is training. I know that for myself, I put on, I think, five different active shooter trainings. And not only was that for the police, but that was also for the dispatch. They were involved in our training. I haven't heard of any other center that puts forth the effort that we did at that time of involving dispatch in that type of training. That's one of the benefits of a smaller town um able to do that. I'm just trying to look at some of my notes here. Um, I don't I don't want to sit here forever and go through it, but I think that if you would like to reach out to me, I'm happy to provide the number uh to you to go over uh many of the items I've discussed tonight at greater detail to include the 2014 um when we went through that process of looking at changing the dispatch centers. I would love to give you the knowledge that I have. Like I said, I cut my teeth downstairs as a dispatcher. I worked my way up um from part-time to full-time dispatching. Then I went from dispatching to dispatch supervisor and then ultimately to the police chief. One of my projects that I was involved in was writing all the grants for the towers for Kier Sarge um at that time. But there's a whole lot more that needs to be looked at I think on the police department side that might be forgot. If you're looking at it just as a dispatch center and the cost of 600,000 or $680,000, how is that going to actually affect the officers here and the work that they're done? And what other things may you not be thinking of that is going to have to just transfer from the dispatch budget over to the police department budget? because I I I just cannot see you leaving a single officer out here in the middle of nowhere at 2:00 in the morning praying that when you're in the booking center downstairs, somebody's sitting in handover watching what's going on with an array with a a right person or fights because we could go on and on for hours about the amount of issues that we've dealt with from two broken jails uh door cells blown out fights, struggles, um all kinds of stuff. I think that that history would be important and I would be more than welcome to sit down um and talk to you because I think I have a lot of knowledge um in this area right down to even costs um and the importance of keeping dispatch here in town. >> So, >> thank you. I will probably take you up on that. >> Thanks, Ed. Christy, did you have anything you wanted to say? You're okay. Uh John Ellis, did you have anything you wanted to Nope. Okay. Well, I think uh we are ending a little early. Uh which is wonderful. We get you. We've got to do a little wrap up here at the end. Okay, Colin is back. >> I I I would just like to better appreciate when you said shared services that we we have a lot of shared services through the other towns. Could you share with me what you're thinking and what part of them are dispatch related? >> School districts. >> School. >> Okay. So, you're talking about things other than dispatch. We also have Tritown Assessing, which is a shared department. Okay. Um, your is it your public works? >> Okay. No, I thought you were talking about dispatch related or police related stuff. Okay. >> Thank you. Because I I think it's important uh to lose comments and Ed's comments that we be very clear about what dispatch means versus other functions that are going on. when you look at the reports, uh, you'll find things that are in the reports that are happening at police stations across the world that have nothing to do with dispatch. So, I think we need to differentiate what's going on that's dispatch related from what is not dispatch related and then focus on the dispatch. >> And can I go back to the comment you made about shared services because I think you were asking about within the dispatch framework, correct? Sorry about that. Yeah. >> Um what's currently happening and it impacts how they're dispatched as well is fire services right now and this is all over the country and probably all over the world as you said typically smaller towns even big cities can't pull together a full complete response to certain events without the help of other agencies outside of their municipalities. Happens in big cities happens in small towns. So, if there were a fire at the New London in, what is going to be on those fire trucks when they pull up? It's going to be everybody that works at New London, but it's also going to be all the towns around here. So, that's one form of shared services, mutual aid. >> Mutual aid, right? >> One thing that is unique to small towns is the law enforcement part of mutual aid. And larger metropolitan areas, it's like the Great Wall of China. Law enforcement shall not cross that wall unless it's very extenduating circumstances. In this type of environment, they often back each other up. So, it kind of doesn't matter what's on the side of your car long as you show up as another law enforcement officer to back up this lone officer in this town who's the only one. Kind of the description that he was given about when you're in this trouble and this dispatch center can then send it. Yes, all of these things can be done from anywhere. You can go to another state and say, I want the physical process of answering my calls and dispatching functions to be handled somewhere else. But it's all the other things that aren't quantified or qualified and that process that are impacted by it. And then the decision is, is it worth making the change? Is it worth the cost? Because there's a cost to making change. If you just look at what does it cost us to pay someone else to perform the service, you had to get there. And to get there, there's a whole lot of costs involved in that. >> Yeah. I look forward to understanding what you think those costs are. Yeah. And I I think that what's important and then I'll sit down is that we we I hope that what you bring to the table is to put a line of demarcation between those actions that occur in the course of a day that are directly linked to a dispatch function from those actions that happen in the course of the day that are indirect link. dispatch might be involved in doing a dispatch of personnel for one thing or another and and whether that dispatch center sits here or handover or somewhere else you know how does that change right so I think that distinction is going to be very important when we finally get down to the to the bottom line >> do my best to describe that because as I said it's not wrong or right it's different and what works for you guys >> or what could work >> what could work >> right thank you. >> Okay. Sure. >> Oh, sure. Ed, come on up. >> Oh, mic on. >> Ed, >> will you turn the mic on? Thank you. >> I have another thing that I can offer which is very rare, I would say, um, for a police police officer. I am still currently the goan New Hampshire police chief. I've been there now for 33 years. I was actually a dual chief for seven years between the two towns which was interesting. But I have had the opportunity to have three different dispatch centers in the town of Goan and we currently operate under Southwest Mutual aid fire and then I am dispatched through Newport Police Department. The only reason that we actually were one of those towns that did leave here. The reason why we left at the at the time was um with the narrow banding getting over Sun was hard. If Sonip was able to put up, you know, a nice tower up in there and get get on, I'd be very happy to come back. Uh but with that said, um I can tell you all the breakdowns between fire and police. And I'm not picking on fire or police. We're talking strictly about dispatch centers. I can tell you about how many times that I wake up and find out that last night in the town of Goan, somebody died of a heart attack and I was never notified of that call because Southwest forgot to call Newport Dispatch. That happens a lot more than you think in larger agencies. Southwest is a very large agency which you'll have the opportunity I think to look at but a little town of goan population of a thousand a lot of times does not get that phone call to Newport dispatch and that is scary um to know that you know I am just 11 minutes from town and that I'm not receiving that uh call so I think I have even a more knowledge in this in that for 22 years of being a full-time time police officer here. I got to see what it's like to be split dispatch and a combined dispatch. And I can tell you that minutes save lives. Um I have two life- saving awards in town strictly because I was able to see the 911 monitor, come up with a call in dispatch, and get in a cruiser and be on the way faster than 911 could actually call. Because a lot of people may not know this, but on 911, they'll send a little thing to dispatch. Is that still the same, Chief Cop? They'll send a little message to dispatch and you can just see there's a medical call four miles down the road. Jump in the cruiser, go flying down there and find a lady choking on a lobster tail. I was able to do that in the time it took 911 to call New London and New London to take the two minutes required to send out the tone and I'm doing the himuk maneuver down there and then CPR and saving a life. You're not going to get that type of service. So, I know um what they're talking about just concentrating on dispatch kind of felt like it was a little bit forget about what the police end needs, but having that there is a major bonus because that's just one call and there's lots of calls that because of that dispatch center being in there, we have a one or two minute jump before a fire department can be toned. Um, so again, I just wanted to point that out to you because I think I have a broader view of what it's like to be with a split dispatch center versus a combined dispatch center. Thank you. >> Thanks, Ed. >> Okay. Well, thank you everybody for coming. We will continue to provide updates along the way as they become available. Um and then we will at the end of this um when Sherry has done her work have uh a public review session I guess of her report. So more to come. Thank you all.