City Council Meeting- 8/10/26
The City Council approved July 13th meeting minutes and corrected the June 4th minutes to reflect no recusals occurred by Councelors Brown and Caleb; both votes passed without opposition. The council conducted a public hearing on Ordinance 26A to enable social districts, allowing open alcohol carry in designated areas by amending the city code. The ordinance creates a legal exception for social districts and requires code administration to create an application and enforcement policy for future council review and approval. Councelor Brown recused from consent calendar item 17 regarding police department business. The executive councilor provided updates on a vetoed $300 million state highway plan and a 4-1 vote against a $600 million men's prison study. No other budget amounts or appointments were specified during this session. Source: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Zav4Kujio0I
meeting of Monday, August 10th, 2026. Um, I will mention uh that uh if anyone in the audience has difficulty hearing uh we do have audio devices available in the back uh of the room at the Conquer TV uh booth where Mike has been waving his hand. Uh these are headphones that are available uh to help augment uh the sound and help with your hearing if you need them. Uh we all please stand with me and uh say the pledge of allegiance. >> I pledge allegiance to the flag of the United States of America and to the republic for it stands one nation under God indivisible with liberty and justice for all. >> Thank you. Madame clerk would please call the role. >> Yes. Councelor Brown here. Mayor Chimplan >> present. >> Councelor Davyy >> uh excused. >> Councelor Fennessy >> excused. >> Councelor Foot >> Councelor Grady Su >> here. Councelor Horn >> here. >> Councelor Caleb >> Councelor Ke >> Councelor Kick here. >> Councelor Curts >> Councelor Squasher >> Councelor Schultz >> Councelor Seiku >> And councelor Todd >> Thank you. Um, next item is approval of the meeting minutes of our July 13th city council meeting. >> Move approval. Second. >> Moved and seconded. Um, all those in favor, please signify by saying I. >> Opposed? No. >> The eyes have it. Uh, next item on the agenda is a correction of the June 4th, 2026 city council meeting, uh, which was requested by, uh, councelor, uh, Brown. Uh this uh concerns recusals by councelor Brown and council Caleb. Uh during our June 4th city council meeting and vote on the budget, uh councelor Caleb had spoken to me prior to uh that meeting indicating her intent to recuse herself from any items uh that uh pertained to the Thrive Resource Center. uh for some reason at 11:30 at night um I uh failed to mention that and to include that in the minutes uh after I don't I forget how many hours of meetings. Uh therefore, I am going to move uh that the official minutes of the June 4th, 2026 city council meeting be corrected to accurately reflect that no recusals occurred by removing all references stating uh that council Brown advised major mayor Champlain that she was recusing herself from voting on all items related to the concrete police department. Do I have a second? >> Second. >> Seconded. All in favor? >> Opposed? >> No. >> Eyes have it. Uh the uh motion is passed. Uh that next brings us to item uh number seven point >> which is madam >> um you didn't address the part. Were you going to change the minutes to reflect that you spoke with councelor Caleb prior to the meeting >> because there still were no recusals that occurred during that. >> Sure. Thank you. >> Thank you. Um, now, uh, it's my pleasure to invite our executive counselor, councelor Karen, uh, Leo Hill, to come forward and give us an update on what's going on with our executive council district. Greetings. >> Welcome. >> Well, thank you so much. Uh, and it's nice to be with all of you, counselors and mayor. Uh, I was a city councelor in Lebanon for 20 years prior to running for executive counsel. And so I have tremendous respect and uh appreciation for all of the work and especially the many hours that you put in on behalf of the public and our shared constituents. I am here to give you a quick update. I know you have a a long meeting ahead of you, but appreciate the opportunity to spend a few minutes with you. Uh the executive council has been called the most important office you've never heard of. And uh typically uh I I am explaining to people what the executive counsel does. And so I know many of you do know the executive council, but folks who are watching or who are listening um may not. And so in brief, I think of the executive council actually a lot like a city council, just for the entire state. Um I use the word cars when I talk about the executive council. We're the only first of all I should say we're the only state that has an executive council like ours. We're the only biccameal executive branch in the country. All states have a governor. We have a governor and then five executive counselors. And uh the governor has the power to put things on the agenda, but she doesn't get a vote. And the five of us get to vote, but we don't get to have any choice on what's on the agenda. And so in that way, we are sharing power and we are a check and balance on the governor. I use the word cars when I talk about the executive council because we vote on contracts, all state spending over $10,000, which is all state spending. Um, A is for appointments. The way it works in New Hampshire is that the governor makes nominations for important boards and committees, commissioners, all judges, and the executive council votes on those confirmations. R is for roads. We are responsible for managing the state's infrastructure, which is a lot of roads, but also bridges, dams, prisons, and that's something I want to talk about in just a moment. Um, and S, so contracts, appointments, roads, and lastly, uh, oh, and roads, including the state's 10-year highway plan, which I also am going to talk about briefly. Um, and lastly, S is for services. We do a lot of constituent services, as I know all of you are also familiar with. Um, and so I certainly want you to know that if you have any constituents who are coming to you with questions or concerns, um, or if the city as a constituent, um, I'm here to serve, whether it's individuals or organizations or, uh, municipalities, I am here to be a liazison with state government. Um, a couple of quick topics I wanted to talk to you about was, um, ICE, the 10-year plan, the men's prison, uh, and property taxes. So I come to this evening I was just in downtown Keen where there was a gathering of the community and uh a number of local organized by local elected officials um because this morning there was an ICE uh there was an ICE presence and a detention uh of some kind. I don't know the the facts of it um other than there have been firsthand reports uh and eyewitness accounts of um of ICE presence in Keen. Also over the weekend, there was also I have confirmed that there was also ICE activity in Lebanon on Friday. And so I think um it's fair to say that it appears that ICE is now um taking becoming more active in New Hampshire and potentially uh targeting larger sized communities and so I share that information with you. I don't believe that the city of conquered is a party to the 287g agreement. Is that correct? >> Correct. Okay. Um, the state of New Hampshire is and I have been in communication with the attorney general's office about what the parameters of are of our state police interactions with ICE. Um, so I'll be sharing some information and I think it's um I see my perspective as that it's important for the public to understand what is happening. People are concerned for their safety. Uh we've seen in other places that ISIS presence actually makes people less safe. Uh, and so I'm here to try and ask questions and get answers for the public. Regarding the state's 10-year highway plan, as you all know, this is the 10-year plan that really addresses state roads and bridges. Um, there is always far more work to be done than there are funds to do them with. And so, this document is updated every two years on a rolling basis. And over this last year, I know many of you were able to attend or followed the 10-year plan update, we actually had to cut $300 million of projects from the 10 from the next version of the 10-year plan because there simply are not adequate funds. One of the ideas that was considered was a $1 increase to the toll um that would cover funds for turnpike projects including the Bo conquered um highway safety improvement project that's been in discussions for a very long time as well as a very significant exits five and six safety improvement project um in Manchester. So, the legislature ended up uh ended up passing the 10-year highway plan, but also passed it with a toll increase. As a result, the governor, who has uh indicated publicly prior that she was opposed to a toll increase, even though it would only affect outofstate residents, the Department of Transportation had um figured out a way to make it so that New Hampshire residents would not be uh New Hampshire easy pass holders would not be subject to the toll increase. um she vetoed the 10-year highway plan. And so, as a result, I know some folks have been wondering what is the status um status right now is that uh is that the previous plan remains in place. That's what the um Department of Transport, that's what the attorney general has been advising is that the previous plan remains in place. So, ironically, it's a plan that was actually $300 million overs subscribed. So, we're now in a place where we have a less realistic 10-year plan on the books. Um, we will see. Veto day is coming up, so who knows? Um, there will still be developments ongoing. But I do think that I want I wanted to raise this with you because the status of the Bo Conquered project is um is inshed in these discussions. Um, it will not come to pass. The construction funds are simply not there unless there is an increase to the tolls which have not has not taken place for 20 years now. It's been a dollar at hookset for 20 years now. Um so that's on my radar and that will I will share information as it becomes available. the men's prison. Uh you all know um but it's been new to me over the last year and a half to learn more about the conditions of the men's prison which are really quite atrocious. Um and the need to replace it is clear. The I had a tour last year and then the governor and the executive council had a tour of the men's prison together uh about six months ago and the consensus was that something needs to be done. the legislature has appropriated funds to complete a study. Um, however, the executive council on a 4 to1 vote voted down the study the the um the contract to hire the consultant to do the study to come up with options and pricing for what will be the largest capital project in our state's history. Uh, at the time, a few years ago, it was estimated to be $600 million. Um the executive council voted down the study um because they wanted to see if it could be done in a more cost-effective way. Um I raised objections or concerns because the more you put off these kinds of projects, the more the higher the costs go and we're seeing significant escalation in costs on all kinds of construction projects as you know well. Um and so I have concerns that putting it off um will raise costs. However, what this does do is it potentially does give us opportunity to reconsider what might happen at the men's on the campus of the men's prison. I know that the city of conquered since this is within your jurisdiction. I know that you I think I have read and I don't know exactly where that that the city has been um opposed to the prison. So I'm here to say that I would appreciate opening up conversation so that I can understand the interests of the city of conquered so that if there are any changes that could be considered that I can advocate as best as possible. Um so that's the men's prison. Um and oh I I also have had a meeting I should also say the city the town of B sorry the town of BO is also my constituent and when I met with them I would say in the last several months and I know this is not news to you but they are interested and they certainly made it clear to me that they were interested in securing some intermunicipal agreements with you regarding uh disposal of waste water. I do believe so. I am interested in I I >> They want the They want the good water. >> They want the good water. Okay. The good water. So, an intermissible agreement for good water. I guess they'll take care of the disposal, but you know more and hopefully you can I just want to put it on the record that I'm also here. >> I'm sure you're on firm footing. [clears throat] >> Thank you. I Thank you. And lastly, property taxes. You know, as someone who spent 20 years uh serving at the local level and now [clears throat] two almost two years at the state level, I can tell you that the common refrain that I hear from people is that property taxes are just too high. And what I am increasingly concerned about is that this issue is being politicized in a way that I have not seen that has not really happened previously. Where I see right now that local officials are being blamed for high property taxes when the fact is that the state has been continuously downshifting costs to cities and towns and school districts over the last 50 years. and the the true burden of property taxes is and and property tax relief, the solution for property tax relief is really something that uh the state I think it's beyond time for the state to address this. And one of the things I really cherished about serving at the local level is that it was not partisan. I mean, I think Manchester and NSHA maybe are elected on a partisan basis, but um >> there is that is is that they're not >> they're all nonpartisan. >> They're all n part technically. Okay. Well, in Lebanon, they are technically and also in spirit nonpartisan. I think most people recognize that there [clears throat] are not partisan solutions to uh water and wastewater and landfills and where we send our trash and how we pay for our roads. And yet, this issue of property taxes I see becoming politicized. And so, um, I have made it my mission to go on the road for part of the last six months and to share with folks about how, um, over the last 15 years alone, the state has downshifted over $3 billion of costs onto the backs of local property taxpayers. And so, uh, I can I'm not going to give you my 30 minute spiel, um, here, [clears throat] but that's, uh, I think that's an important thing. I guess I just want you to know that I've got your back. um because I know that we're all really struggling and everyone is doing the best with what we're handed down from um from the state legislature unfortunately. And so um there you go. That's my list. Uh I have my card which I will um send to share around with with all of you and if I can be of assistance and of service to you and your constituents uh I would invite you to call on me. >> Thank you councelor. Any questions for council Leo Hill? Council. Uh thank you your honor. Just one um suggestion for your notebook. >> Conquered is the only city that has our school and city council separated. And so we when we talk about property taxes, we are talking about only the city portion. However, the weight of our school taxes in both of the school districts that are here have become overburdensome to the point where our our residents are being crushed. >> Absolutely. Lebanon Lebanon is the same. There are actually only two school districts I think in the state that have um where the school districts are dependent on the on the city. Most cities have separate um Lebanon has a separate city and school. Twothirds uh across the state about twothirds of the average property tax bill is public schools. So it certainly is the elephant in the room in this discussion about >> we don't set their budget. We have nothing to do with their budget. >> Correct. But they are being similarly crushed by the decisions being made at the state level to for example the biggest one is eliminating the state's contribution to retirement. Eliminating the state's contribution to firefighters and police officers and teachers. That has been $2 billion on local property taxpayers in the last 15 years alone. So um thank you for that clarification. >> Any other question council? Yes. Just in regards to the prison, um I'm not sure what the current population is now, but I do know that as of January, the entire incarcerated population in all of New Hampshire was 19 uh was 1990. Uh the census block for the men's prison states 2246, but that is incorrect. That is not the population at that location. 2246 is the total incarcerated population in 2020. So I know they're looking at a 1500 bed prison. I don't know. I think it's the capacity there is only 1,400. So you know I would be curious if we really need if New Hampshire really needs such a large um prison. So, if you could look into that uh correcting that census block um population, that'd be great. >> So, two issues. >> Yes. >> One is the census block >> is incorrect. >> Making sure that that's accurate and that would be the men's prison and the women's prison. They're [clears throat] both in the same >> Well, that number Yes. I I >> Okay. >> Yes. I confirmed with DOC, Department of Corrections, that the 2246 reflects all of New Hampshire's incarcerated people. Um Yes. Not just that. Is that what? But you said the census block shows that >> the census block says that the census block from >> So it put all of it put all of the incarcerated people in that location. >> I see. I see what you're saying. >> And if that prison Oh, I think their capacity is only 1,400. I do not believe they are at capacity. So I don't necessarily think we should we need 1500 bed prison, >> which is another which is which is the second issue. Yes. And I have that same I think we need to make sure that we are doing good forecasting to make sure that we are not overbuilding. Uh and uh I that is definitely I think a really important uh factor. >> Just aside I would prefer that it's not conquered. >> That's just me personally. >> Thank you councelor Kel Schultz. I'm sorry. >> Thank you. Um so glad you're here today. I was kind of hoping you would do the 30 minute version because I think that is really informative. If we wanted to find that though, where can we find your >> I have a slide presentation. I'd be happy to share it uh and send it out to all of you. >> That would be great. And then my um second question is about you know I realize we don't have anything to do with our school budgets and our two school districts but do you have a sense or is there a way we can find out how many um how many students that would be going to public school are receiving the voucher money. I think it's like 4,000 a student or something like that to go to private school on uh taxpayer dollars. How do we find out how many people in conquered are getting that taxpayer money to go to private school? That is a great question. I'm certainly can ask the Department of Education. I would imagine that they have statistics on that. Um we do know that 90% of the students who are using those vouchers um that um that they are not leaving public school to use that they were already attending private school or religious school and in um fewer cases homeschooling. Um so 90% of those funds that are leaving our public school systems are going to people to families who quite honestly didn't need it. Um and that was one of the consequences of eliminating the income uh the income requirement. It was originally started as a way to support, you know, kids maybe who were falling through the cracks and uh lowincome families and then it was obviously um changed. So, it's having a greater over $50 million in the last year alone um went out in vouchers and 90% of that was to to families who were already sending their kids to private school. I'd be happy to look into the statistics for uh the city conquered the two school districts. I know that district [laughter] in the city of conquered. We'll look into that. >> Thank you, >> Council Leo Hill. If uh you uh care to share the slide deck, uh you can with us, you can just send it to city clerk Janice Bonafont, >> right? >> And she can circulate it to the city council. >> Thank you very much. And actually, um I will leave a question for you. I also just received a Oh, now I'm echoing. I just received a copy of a letter that was sent from the cities of Manchester, Nshawa, and Portsouth from their citys to the Secretary of State asking for guidance on the um HB1300 question that is going to be on the ballot. Um apparently the wording of the ballot language doesn't match the process in those cities and so those city clerks are asking for guidance. I will send you that letter to see. I'm curious to know if it's also a similar concern uh here in the city of >> Thank you. >> Super. >> Well, thank you very much. >> Thank you so much. >> I hope you'll come back. >> That brings us to the consent uh calendar portion of our meetings. I'll note that excuse me, [clears throat and cough] items 22 and 23 have been pulled from the consent calendar. Uh for anyone in the audience who's interested in those two items, I'll mention that they will be taken up at the end of uh this evening's business. Uh may I have a motion to approve the consent? >> So, council second. >> Moved and seconded. Councelor Brown. >> Yes. I'm recusing myself from uh consent item number 17 as my husband is a police officer. >> Thank you, councelor. Are we ready for the vote? All in favor, please signify by saying I. >> I >> oppose. No. Eyes have it. Consent calendar is adopted. This moves us to our public hearing phase of our meeting. Madam city clerk, item number 27. >> 26A. Want to start? >> Oh, I'm sorry. I was going to action. I'm sorry. Thank you. 26A. That's what happens when you take a vacation. >> A welldeserved one. Um, an ordinance amending the code of ordinances, title one, general code, chapter 14, morals and conduct. >> Thank you, Mr. Acting City Manager. >> I would like to call uh the deputy the city solicitor up to discuss this issue, please. Sorry about that. >> Demoted. >> I think I just got demoted. [laughter] >> We'll talk tomorrow. >> Probably probably deserved it. Um, so good evening, Mr. Mayor, uh, members of the council. Um the uh ordinance before you uh is a result of um legislative changes that took place last year. Uh legislature passed RSA 17833 through 38 um which authorized social districts in New Hampshire. Um the way that the uh legislation was structured, uh municipalities needed to opt in through a ballot initiative and conquered uh placed the question on the ballot last November uh and and it passed um allowing the city um and specifically the city council to establish um social districts within the city. Um under that legislation, social districts are uh areas uh that are defined and bound bounded uh where uh individuals can uh carry out open carry alcoholic beverages uh between license uh licensed establishments. So um those establishments that already have liquor licenses, they can serve within designated uh receptacles and it allows the patrons to go out in that rounded area and enjoy their beverage while walking around. Um, so as we noted, the city indicated an interest in doing so by passing the ballot question. Um, and the question then became, um, if we were going to, uh, press forward with, uh, social districts, how do we, um, go about, uh, implementing that? Um, and so the, uh, public safety advisory board has been reviewing, um, how to go about that implementation. Um and they worked with uh our office um to basically look at what would the legal framework be for for that. Um so the uh the way that the ordinances read right now uh there's a general prohibition on um consuming alcohol in public. Um there are exceptions to that. Obviously in areas where there are licenses. So, if you think of the patios of particular um establishments, we have an exception for um nonprofits, which is what we do for um market days every year. Um we have beer gardens that are uh set up under that exception. Um but we would need to within the ordinance create an exception for social districts. Um we would also need to set up a process for how social districts would come before the council and would get uh review and approval. So what you have in front of you is the proposal that was uh we worked with uh the public safety advisory board. Um and it very it is very simply an enabling ordinance. There's still a lot of work to be done. So this would be step one in a multi-step process before we would move forward with actual social districts. So what the ordinance in front of you proposes to do is one create the legal exception to allow social districts um in in the city. Um, two, to ask code uh administration to create an application and enforcement policy that would come back before you uh for your [clears throat] review and approval of how we're actually going to get applications in and then decide what the rules are going to be, the maintenance plan as it is laid out in city uh, excuse me, in state law. Um and then three, once we have that set up, how our applications going to be received and reviewed. And in the ordinance as as um as written right now, uh those would be go through an initial review at the public safety advisory board where they could hold a hearing if they so chose um or get public input at that point and then send a recommendation to the city council. So this is again it would be what what you have in front of you is a first step in the process enabling those uh social districts and um there would still be other uh aspects that council would have to review and approve in order for us to get to a place where these would be operational. So happy to answer any questions that you might have regarding the ordinance in [clears throat] front of you or the law or the process. >> Thank you. Any questions for Mr. Confori? Councelor Brown. >> Yes. I noticed that a number of items on the agenda are typically referred to a committee. Um the council has decided that this is something we want to address. I don't believe that the council actually referred this to the public safety board. Is that correct? >> I am not aware of whether how the public safety advisory board began uh their deliberations on this. >> Any other follow? Yes. Perhaps I could ask the chair of the public safety board. I know that there was conversation publicly uh that you had said it should be re referred uh do you recall a time do you recall >> counselor what's your concern >> was this referred to the public safety board >> I'm just wondering what you're what you're getting toward the process I'm looking at other items that are referred to the public safety board and have been referred and I'm wondering when this was referred >> sure the public safety advisory board spent several months working on this and that was generated through discussion and I I'm not sure if there was a formal recommendation, but there doesn't need to be a formal recommendation for the public safety advisory board to take up any items. >> I think that the counselor is confusing letters and requests from uh members of the public which are referred to various committees. Uh any other questions for Mr. Confori? >> I'm sorry, Council Kayla. >> Yes, just a quick one. Um, so is this saying um that the city council would have to take a vote on every like application that comes forward for a social district? >> So we would um the city council is the is the party that has to establish the social district. So if we had licenses that wanted to establish particular district, yes, it would have to come before you in order to get approval. >> Okay. Thank you. >> Any other questions? C >> follow up to that and code will write the a draft of the policy and then bring it to us. So for example, if code said we would have the power to then determine if we're approving something to happen annually or to say that we want to review it every iteration. >> Correct. That is something that I think is left open to the buildout of the policy in terms of what level of whether you wanted to um approve once and then allow it to stay um as it is um even intermittently um or if you want people to come back to you every single time there's going to be a social distance. >> Uh councelor Credovic and then councelor Kay. >> Thank you. Just for clarity sake, this is no different than if somebody was going to do a permit for a street closure or if somebody was going to do an event permit or somebody was going to do a parade permit or a banner permit. These all run through code enforcement and the public safety board was recommending that they oversee this process because they're already familiar with this process. Do I have that >> That's correct. I think that they were looking at that as analogous processes and code usually does the the policy and the application process and PSAB obviously does review those and have oversight of those and so I think in looking at this from my understanding of being in those discussions they were looking at this as analogous to those types of events that you were just talking about. >> Okay, councelor Caleb. >> Yes. Um and so similar I guess to all of those permits um and things like that. Uh would this would there be like fee structures like application fees and okay is that deter like is that deter determined by council? >> That would be determined by council. So when um when code would come back before you, they would have an application process and that would uh have the application itself, the enforcement process that they would have um and then it would have a fee structure. Um again, council in this ordinance is maintaining complete control over this. This is again an enabling step to carve out in the law the ability to go forward with these social districts. Um and then asking code to put together a process for you to review with regard to that. >> Great. Council Todd. >> Uh thank you, your honor. This is maybe a question for you, but um the uh process then if we if we reach the point of an application applied for that is being presented to the city council that uh we would have uh the ability then to hold a public hearing so the public would actually be able to provide input before we would make a decision about any particular application for social district. Correct. >> Correct. >> Council Brown. >> Yes. Do we have I I understand that Laconia has a social district. Do we have any information about um how that's going? >> I I did reach out um it went into effect in u I think Memorial Day weekend and I did reach out to um Laconia a few weeks in and from what I understood that it had been quiet. It had been a success. um to that point. Um I have not spoken to them since then or um I may check in with them at the end of the summer to see what what other learnings we can have from them. >> Followup. >> Uh would it be possible to get could you um forward that to the entire council the results of that conversation? >> I can we'll if we'll report it to the city manager and let city manager determine how to uh uh get that information to you. Okay. >> All right. Thank you, Mr. Conford. >> I'll open the public hearing. Is there anyone in the audience who would like to testify on this item? Yes, sir. Please. Welcome. >> Hey. Uh, thanks for having me. Uh, my name is Ben Greenlate. I live at uh 47 South State Street. Um, so I just want to say thank you to all of you and the mayor. Um, but most importantly the voters for approving this. Um, I know it was a pretty close vote. I think it got about 52%. Um, but I think this is a great opportunity for the city. Um, and uh, I just want to say personally, so um, I used to work for the legislature. Um, I worked for the nonp nonpartisan office of legislative services and I was involved in the drafting process for this law, this series of laws. Um, and I think this is an awesome opportunity for the city. Um, the law itself is pretty big. Um the uh city just really has the responsibility to make sure that licences put either a sticker on the um glasses or that they have a label on them that says 21 only. You know, it says the um R or place that they got the drink from. Um, and the city just says it needs to designate um, a certain area and that area needs to have signs that say you can't go past this point with these drinks. Um, but other than that, it's really up to the city council to decide how they want to approach this. Um, so you can set um, date or time limits. Um, you can do it year round. Um, you can do it like Laconia where they do it for weekends um, in a you know area downtown. Um, and so I think this is a great opportunity and this is a rare um rare opportunity from the legislature that has done a lot of bad things for local government over the years. Uh, and I think that this is a rare opportunity and the city should seize it. Um, so um, I also want to say that um, you know, I think that not having it in place by market days was a missed opportunity. Um, I think this is a real draw. I think this is a real opportunity for local businesses to see, I don't know, tens of thousands of dollars of additional revenue. Um, and I think the city can approach it however they want. Um, and so I think that this is great that this process is moving forward. Um, and I really hope that the city moves forward because it was mentioned earlier, Laconia has implemented this. They had bike week and didn't have any problems with this. So, I think this goes to show that this can really be done um in a safe, effective way that really benefits our local businesses, especially when they are going to be hit with some high property tax increases. So, um please keep this process moving forward. Thank you again. That's all. Any questions for sleep? >> Yes. Um how much trash did this generate in Laconia? cuz I know that trash cans are a is are very contentious right now in conquered because they're not in parks and they're in c they're in like the cemetery, they're at the golf course. A lot of people want to see trash cans and this has been when I called and spoke to other uh communities that implemented that. That was their complaint is that it generates a lot [clears throat] of trash. >> Implemented social districts. >> I believe Laconia is the only one that's done that. >> No, no, no. Because of other states that have done it. Um, you know, that's I can't speak to that trash issue, but just off the top of my head, I think that um, and I think one other thing I would like to say I forgot to mention was that I think any moving forward with this process should really make sure to include local businesses. Um, give them a seat at the table because, you know, I think they're the ones that know best what's going to work for them and I think that they really be consulted in how this moves forward. But I would also say I think that a lot of these local businesses would be more than happy to sponsor trash cans if that means that they can serve drinks to people. So I think that best way to address that would be engaging with the local business community because I'm sure that they would be willing to pay for purple bags to get the ability to sell off off premise. Councilman, >> thank you so much for coming. I really appreciate it. I like having somebody here that was on the ground level um in [snorts] writing the legislation. It was my understanding last fall when this was first being brought up, part of the reason that um we wanted to institute social districts was in support of our local restaurants specifically because they're losing somewhere in the tune of 60 billion dollars a year in revenue to um beer and alcohol sales because of the surrounding states that sell marijuana. >> Is that true? >> I don't know. I I yeah [laughter] I I you know I I just honest man >> I've read I've read the bill I had a hand in drafting it. Um I'm a fan of it but I mean I can't really speak and I know I've read the reports about Laconia how it's gone there how it's gone very well. Um what I would say is and I would also go yes alcohol sales are down. I think that's for a number of reasons. I think it's also because apparently the zoomers don't drink is what they say. So, it's also true. I think this is an opportunity to >> re-imagine um >> the community and the public's relationship with alcohol. >> Thank you. I appreciate it. >> Any other questions? >> All right. Thank you. Thank you so much. >> Thank you very much. >> Appreciate you coming up to testify. Is there anyone else who would like to testify on item 26A? Right. Seeing none, I'll close the public hearing. Madam City Clerk, item 26B. It is a public hearing regarding the status of $130,000 in community development block grant funds, the majority of which were subgranted to the conquered coalition to end homelessness for costs incurred in operating emergency winter shelter at 240 North Main Street and the resource center at 238 North Main for the period December 1st, 2025 to April 30th, 2026. >> Thank you, Mr. Acting City Manager. I am not going to bring titles up. I'm just going to invite Tim Thompson up to read what he needs to do. [laughter and clears throat] >> Welcome, Mr. Thompson. >> Good evening, Mr. Mayor, members of the city council. Uh, as you are no doubt aware of those of you who have been on the council for a while, when we do a status update hearing for a CDBG grant, there's specific requirements that we need to follow in order to meet the federal guidelines. So, please bear with me as I read my script. Uh first and foremost, there are handouts in the back of the room at the table that summarize the status update for this particular CDBG project. Community development block grant funds are available to municipalities through the New Hampshire Community Development Finance Authority. Up to 500,000 annually is available for economic development projects, up to 750,000 for public facilities projects, up to 750,000 for housing projects, and up to 500,000 for emergency activities. Up to $25,000 is available for a planning study grant. Up to $1.038 million was available through a coid9 CDBGCV funding opportunity for public service providers serving unhoused individuals or lower moderate income households or persons impacted by CO 19. All projects under that program had to benefit a majority low and moderate income person. This public hearing is intended to update the public on and take comment on a CDBG CV grant of $130,000, the majority of which was subranted to the Conquer Coalition to End Homelessness for costs incurred for operating their emergency winter shelter at 240 North Main Street and their resource center at 238 North Main Street for the period of December 1, 2025 to April 30, 2026. those [clears throat] funds that were provided reimbursement for the additional services that the coalition provided to people who are experiencing homeless and conquered homelessness and conquered related to CO 19. 674 persons were benefited by this particular project. That ends the script portion. Just to clarify a couple other items for this. Uh, of that $130,000 grant, 114,000 of that was grant subgranted to the coalition that they then used to reimburse their operating costs for the shelter and their resource center during that time. The remaining $16,000 of that $130,000 grant were paid to the CDG consult that the city contracts with for contract administration and grant writing. Any questions? I'm happy to take them at this point. And I also will note that Karen Jansen from the coalition is here if you have any questions for her. >> Mr. Thompson, uh I think that there was some uh confusion on social media, assuming that the $16,000 was an additional [clears throat] grant. Uh you've clarified that that that $16,000 was for administrative costs, correct? Uh connected with applying for and administrating the grant. Correct. And all these funds have all these funds have have been used. >> All the funds have currently been expended. Correct. >> Which is your function tonight. >> Exactly. >> Any other questions? Council War. >> Uh, also I think some confusion from probably similar social media was the dates that we gave the um organization to cover were up until April 30th. >> Um people have seen that they were the winter shel shelter is only open I think through the end of March. We were just giving them dates all inclusive of when it could be open. that time period was established by the CDFA in terms of their grant opportunity for municipalities. So that cover any granting uh agency that received CDBGCV funds under this ground was for that period of December through April. >> Follow up >> just so we weren't requiring you to have the shelter open. >> And I think this is also was not just for the shelter but also for the resource center which is open year round. >> That's correct. Correct. >> Council credit. >> Thank you Mr. Thompson. Is it standard language in these grants that there would be an administrative fee paid out to someone? Even if it was like our city administrative staff that was um overseeing this, we would have um received uh basically the $16,000 to help pay a staff person in house that it's not just um for somebody that uh we hire to do these grants. Is that standard for like most grants? >> It is standard for communities that are not entitlement communities. Uh, Concrete is not an entitlement community. We compete with the state, the entire state for CDBG funds. There are several entitlement communities in New Hampshire, Manchester, Nasha, Rochester. Off the top of my head, are all entitlement communities that receive direct funding from the US Department of Housing and Urban Development. And they administer those funds directly from the federal government. Whereas the rest of New Hampshire, including conquered, competes for these programs that are administered through the community development finance authority. A followup one clarifying um I understood that but this is common for all grants federal grants etc that there is an administrative fee that's typically to the grant >> there is an allowance under federal law for administrative >> cost I just wanted to assure this wasn't something abnormal >> thank you >> questions a foot >> thank you your honor u following um wow help you know, um, last year, maybe it was this year, um, one or the committees I'm on, we were, uh, there were two groups that came in looking for block money. [clears throat] >> Will this distribution negatively affect either one of those potential block grants? No, you're you're I believe you're recalling we had um families in transition was one of the two and there was I believe it was Riverbend looking for fund for the Portill house that were both competing for housing funds which is a separate pot of federal money under the CDBG program. Uh under that program uh the community development advisory committee and the city council opted to apply on behalf of families in transition. That grant has been awarded. They were awarded a $500,000 uh community development block grant housing grant to help assist with their project to convert uh commercial space within their buildings in Bsentennial Square uh to five additional lowincome housing units. Uh out of that $500,000 with 25 or so thousand dollars of that are also being used for administration. So, it's $475,000 will be subgranted to families in transition and $25,000 is for grant administration that particular project, but they are separate pots of of money. Uh the CDBGCV program was a very quick turnaround process with the community development finance authority because the funds that were unexpended initially through that co 19 program were about to be clawed back by the federal government. So this was an additional opportunity for communities to get these funds associated with the CO 19 pandemic which is where we were successful with the coalition. >> I know I'm digressing. What about Riverbend? >> Riverbend was not selected. Uh we can only make one selection uh for the housing or economic development or public facilities programs because those have specific yearly uh deadlines associated with them. So the community development advisory committee out of the two chose that the more competitive application will be families in transition which again was ultimately funded. >> Thank you Mr. Thompson. >> Appreciate it. >> I'll now open the public hearing on item 26B. Is there anyone in the audience who would like to testify? >> Good evening. >> Karen Jason. I'm the executive director of the Conquer Coalition to End Homelessness. So, these funds in particular, this is a rare opportunity for us and we are very grateful for the city um supporting us. We it enabled us with the shelter to open earlier and stay just a half hour and also stay open later in the morning a half hour. That doesn't seem like a lot of time, but when you're coordinating with the friendly kitchen of where people can go and move during the very extreme cold, that makes a lot of difference. In addition, we had during the week um expanded our operating hours to Tuesday and Thursday afternoons. This um and with the extreme cold we had this winter, it this funding enabled us also to stay open 10 Monday afternoons and also an additional 10 Friday afternoons. The city was very generous in granting us funding for warming center hours. Those were only in the afternoon for Saturdays and Sundays during our winter shelter season. But we had a number of weekends where we were open um early on both Saturday and Sunday. We had just ex devastatingly cold cold winter. So all in all this helps support not just our general operations, but about 73 extra hours worth of time that we were open. And in that time, we're able to make deeper connections with people, we're able to provide better case management or ongoing case management support. And over the course of the year, we um in addition to support with community other community agencies were able to house get 43 people housed this past year. So, thank you. questions. >> I just like to thank you. Thank you for bringing up that warming center because I think conquered coalition was a key partner in that and and the friendly kitchen, the two agencies. I think you deserve a lot of credit and and also the friendly kitchen for uh organizing to extend your hours and ensure that there was 247 coverage for places to for people to go both the the winter shelter at night and in the resource center during the day. So, thank you for that work and I think the community should be really grateful for that work of protecting some of our vulnerable citizens. So, thank you very much, >> Councelor Schultz. >> Thank you. Um, thank you, Mr. Mayor. On that note, um, I just wanted to make sure you were aware that there is going to be a discussion around uh, extreme heat [clears throat] um, times. I realize the shelter isn't open, but the resource center probably is. And so, if that's something that you think that your organization could uh, play a role in, that will be coming up in September. >> Next week, >> next week. Sorry. So, I just wanted to make sure if no one had made you aware of that that you knew that this was a discussion that just recently started. >> I I know it's under discussion. We just haven't gone through through it, you know, vetted it and what it would do for our populations, but we do know that the heat is really it's tough. It's really tough on people out there. >> That's a credit. >> Thank you. I just wanted to echo uh councelor Schlloer's words about um [clears throat] how much support and gratitude that the city of conquered should have to your organization. You know, when Mr. Thompson told us about the 614 people that um benefited from the shelter this winter, um I think that the other part that goes along with it was your comment about the more people that you were able to do outreach to this winter. Unfortunately, the heat and the cold drives people indoors places when they are in need, but a lot of the times if the weather were mild, we may not even see them. They'll go under the radar. So, I appreciate all you do, as you know. >> All right. Thank you very much. Thank you. >> Mr. Thompson. >> I say it wrong. I neglected to mention during my presentation that uh you do have an action item associated with this public hearing. There is no action necessary for the council. Just holding the public hearing is all that is required under the law. >> Thank you. So we can skip this when we get to public hearing action. >> We'll rely on the city clerk to keep me on track with that. Is there anyone else who would like to testify on this item? Right. Seeing none, I will close the public hearing. Madam, city clerk, item 26 C. >> It is a resolution appropriating the sum of $67,376 in the general fund as a transfer out to trust and accepting the sum of $67,376 from the Boys and Girls Club of Central and Northern New Hampshire for this purpose. >> Thank you, Mr. Mayor. Uh as part of the off-site improvements identified during the planning board review process for the Pinnacook Community Center, uh the Boys and Girls Club uh was required to construct sidewalks on Dolphin Street. Uh although the city partnered with the Boys and Girls Club on the community center project, uh they were the ones who were responsible for all construction costs. Dolphin Street was part of the fiscical year 23 neighborhood street paving program. That's CIP78. in order to efficiently construct the sidewalk in coordination with the paving project. Uh they agreed to cover the full cost if the city included the sidewalk under the same CIP for the Dolphin Street paving. This work was completed and the funds have all been received by the city. Uh because the sidewalk project was complete and has been closed, the city would like to transfer these funds to the highway reserve for future neighborhood street paving programs. So we have the money now. It's to move the money to the CIP78 or to the reserve account and then that can be used CIP78 in future years. >> Thank you. Any questions for the acting city manager? Right. Seeing none, I'll open the public hearing. Is there anyone in the audience who would like to uh testify on this? >> I think Brown had a question. >> Sorry. Oh, Council Brown, did you have a question? >> Um, I I was I can wait. That's fine. Until at the action phase. I close the public hearing. Madam City Clerk, item 26D. of $11,500 in the Parks and Recreation Miscellaneous Grants and Donations Project for the free summer concert series and accepting the sum $11,500 as a donation from the Walker Lecture Series for this purpose. >> Mr. there. In uh 2022, um the city approached Walker Walker lecture series to see if they would fund an expansion of the concert series to include Sunday morning concerts at the Marramck Lodge at White Park. They agreed to fund uh the expan the expanded series and in the summer of 22 there were 10 concerts that were held at the lodge from mid June to midepptember. Since 2022, the lecture Walker lecture series has continued to fund the Thursday night and Sunday morning free community concerts. Last year, the donation was also $11,500 to include new concerts at Canal Riverfront Park in Pinnacook. Um, and this donation will be used to support the 2026 summer concert series. So, this is just in order for us to be able to move forward that series. city minister? Council Brown. >> Yes. I'm just wondering where um the fund is, where this donation, how can we see how much money is in that and is it exclusive to um this type of event? >> Yeah, this will go into the grants and donations fund. Um and we will be having a full report that will come to the city council when you receive the first quarter report for all the grants and donations. So, you'll see it there. >> Follow up. >> Uh can we I'm sorry. Can we see that um information on the ACFR or in the budget in any of our other financial documents? >> It's included in the ACFR as a consolidated number. Uh it is not included in the regular operating budget on an annual basis. That's why you get it here as a supplemental appropriation. >> You any other questions for the acting city manager? [clears throat] Seeing none, I'll open the public hearing. Is there anyone in the audience who would like to testify on this? Seeing none, I'll close the public hearing. Madam City Clerk, item 26E. >> It is a resolution modifying the elderly exemption for the city of Conquered pursuant to the provisions of RSA 7227A. >> Thank you, Mr. Mayor. I'd like to bring John Rice in order to talk about this uh resolution. Welcome, Mr. Rice. >> Thank you. Good evening, honorable mayor and council members. Uh so this is a recommendation that was made to the tax exemptions uh policy committee uh with the ongoing revaluation in the preliminary numbers for residential uh housing. We want to look at our uh population of people who are currently qualified for the elderly uh exemption. Um and make sure again the goal uh the goal of the committee was to maintain uh the same number of people who qualified for the exemption uh to continue to receive that exemption. I think we had talked about this uh before here at council. um based on prior year and what we prior years I should say leading up to this we tried to project what was needed uh to increase the value at which the um uh the value which we're going to target uh end up at I guess reval wise then what the need would be for that exemption amount we did that preliminary uh we had a meeting with tax exemption policy committee uh that is what is put forward here. However, since then we had our preliminary values went out to residential taxpayers. We took those results and applied them to the need and they matched. So, we did a pretty good job estimating. Um prior to this year, 2025, we had uh 98 uh zero tax bills essentially. So the exemption amount resulted in uh 98 taxpayers receiving a zero tax bill. We're trying to maintain that number and qualify as many people as possible. Based on our projections, currently uh 94 of 98 would continue to have zero tax bill. However, 10 additional people are added to that list. So we have a a total of 104 based on our current projections. and 25 of the people um who uh qualified have a lower assessed value. So um we're kind of tracking all the numbers trying to project. When I did meet with the tax exemption policy committee, we did ask uh for the ability for me as the director of assessing to come forward once we know the residential values are final. We find these numbers drastically change. There is still an opportunity for us prior to the tax bills going out to come back and um make adjustments as needed. And uh I I'm sure you've seen it, but the recommendation uh current amounts are uh the exemption amount for 65 to 74 years old is $80,000. Uh ages 75 to 79 are 131,000. Ages 80 plus 223,000. And our recommendation uh in the resolution is ages 65 to 74 increasing to 155,000, ages 75 to 79 to 250,000, and ages 80 plus to 375,000. >> Thank you, Mr. Rice. Uh I have a quick question. Could you explain how uh an exemption works so that people understand kind of what impact that has on how much someone would pay in property taxes? >> Yeah. So uh exemptions do not act like uh tax credits. We have t tax credits and exemptions. Exemptions are a decrease in value before the tax rate is calculated. Uh so the um amount is the amount of assessed value that will be removed from your assessment prior to your your tax calculation. >> Thank you. So, uh, for example, um, if I was 75 years or older, or up to 80, I guess, I could have $250,000 deducted from the assessed value of my house. So, if my house was uh, let's say was valued at half a million dollar, I'd only pay taxes on $250,000 on that. Correct. >> If they qualify. Yes, >> if I qualify. Yeah, exactly. Any questions? Councelor Schlawson. >> And the qualifications, there's income. These are for lowincome individuals. There's definitely income. >> It's income and asset based. Yeah. >> Yes. Thank you. >> Any other questions for Mr. Rice? >> Professor Schultz, >> I see your wheel the wheels. >> Sometimes you can see the wheels turning. >> I can um I don't know that you can answer this, but is since it's a proactive prog process, isn't it possible that there are people who could qualify that just aren't applying? >> Yes. And we've had quite a few uh with the ongoing residential um hearings that we had uh we had quite a few people u come in and we uh recommended for many of them um you know we we were able to have discussions to determine whether they met or exceeded the uh income and asset limitations if they thought they were close. We we want to encourage taxpayers if to apply. We're not we're not here to deny anyone. It's a it's a system where we have to look at your income. We have to look at your assets. If we can qualify you, you will qualify. >> I feel like that needs to be a headline emlazed in the sky. You might you might qualify. Thank you. >> Any other questions? Council. >> Yes. Um Mr. Rice, you had mentioned that um there may be something else that other things that you could do. What kinds of things could we could you do? I'm I'm not >> Didn't Didn't you just say, you know, bring if somebody doesn't quite qualify, you know, we can still there's still things that we can do. >> I wasn't sure if there was other options. >> I think what he was saying was that if the results of the uh assessments come back and they're significantly different than what was estimated that there would still be time for him to come back to the council to ask for changes to these values, >> right? So, it's really an issue of having a significant change from what was anticipated, which [clears throat] doesn't sound like that's >> No. And based on um again, we had our hearings uh the last uh three and a half, four weeks. Um actually, I think phone hearings are just wrapping up. Um I don't anticipate a large change to the preliminary values. Um there will be some changes. Um there will be final uh notices for those people who are values have changed, but I don't anticipate it'll be large enough to affect the recommendation. >> Council Brown, >> follow up. >> Yes. And this is off of what you just said, Mr. Lebron. Um so people, this is after they get their tax bill that we could still do. Could you rephrase that? At what [clears throat] point? This is really the part of the valuation process when you're looking at where the valuations fall and compared to uh the folks who had qualified and were getting the uh uh exemptions as we were looking at them. If there was a significant change to all of that, we would still have the opportunity before the tax bills were out in order to come back and have the city council make adjustments here. That doesn't look like that's going to be the case, but it still could there still could be some opportunity. >> Correct. And and we review this every year. So even if it weren't prior to the tax bill, we still have an opportunity next year to make >> Just clarification. So we could still make it the tax bills are going out in December. Is that correct? >> November. December. >> November. December. Okay. So we have this that buffer. >> It's it's really I mean that's the when the tax bills go out, but if you think about when the tax rate gets set, if you think about when the MS1 report is filed with the Department of Revenue, there's a lot of things that have to happen before that tax rate goes out. These values have to be established and completed by that time. We'll know very shortly if there is going to be anything based on the preliminary discussions that you're having and the preliminary review. You just said that there really wasn't a lot of additional changes that you're seeing. It still could happen. It doesn't look like it's going to, but it would have to be done long before the time the tax bill goes out because there are plenty of things that have to happen before that tax bill is actually calculated. And and I only brought it up because we had the discussion to give me the power to come and make a recommendation to city council so that we wouldn't have to hold another meeting. And >> it's a safety it's a safety measure. Yeah. Yeah. The the the committee did in fact give you the authority to come back power to come back. Any other questions for Mr. Rice? >> One last. >> Sure. >> Uh the when will the commercial property assessments be completed? >> That's a great question. Uh letters uh went out today. They're in the mail not being received. It may take um three, four days start being received. >> Mr. Rice, would you believe that my uh new assessment is pretty much spot on to what the many real estate agents who really want to sell my house telling me my house is valued. >> I mean, I can believe it, but [laughter] >> Well, you did good job on my house anyway. >> All right. and it was 58% increase for a single family home. So that's right in the range of that 60% that you estimated. So you did really well. >> Right. Thank you very much. >> Don't go too far. I figured [laughter] >> uh is there I'm going to open the public hearing. >> You can go. >> You can you can leave for now. >> Yeah. >> Don't go too far. >> You're getting you're getting cross signals. I'm sorry. But yeah, don't go too far. Is there anyone in the audience who would like to testify on this item, the elderly tax exemption? >> All right. Hearing close the public hearing. Uh, Miss Miss Ms. City Clerk. Um, item 20 uh 26F, please. It is a report from the director of assessing recommending the city manager be authorized to enter into a payment and move taxes agreement between the city of conquered and brier hydro associates for Ralph Canal Falls, Penokeook upper falls and Penuk lower falls. >> Thank you, Mr. City Manager. Do I suspect we're going to hear from Mr. Rice again? >> I believe we're going to hear from Mr. Rice again. So, John, if you could come back up. >> Welcome back, Mr. Rice. >> Been a while. Yeah, >> you've gotten grayer. >> What's that? >> You've gotten grayer. >> Athens. Uh, thank you for that. [laughter] Um, so this is a an agreement you've seen before um with Brier Hydro. Uh we've been working with uh I guess in the assessing department to come up with a value for their assets. Um it can be a challenging uh process. Uh we have been we have negotiated with Brier Hydro in the past for uh payment L uh agreements and what we we went to Brier Hydro this year with ongoing revaluation. We asked them if they would do a bridge year with the city uh in the interest of finalizing the value of their property. Uh that process is ongoing. Um, we I I have a preliminary value, but we did not have it when we needed to be negotiating. Their prior contract uh was up uh March 31st of of 26. So, uh this is a bridgeear contract. It's the same contract you've seen uh the prior year for $255,000. It's a flat fee agreement uh based on the value that I assigned to it for 2025. uh the tax rate and then um a discount that we looked at uh for 2025. Again, we're looking at this a bridge year. We're going to develop a value on this property, same with every other property uh for the revaluation and apply the tax rate and have to renegotiate. We're looking to do uh five-year uh agreements in the future. This is just the bridge year for that. >> Thank you. Any questions for Mr. Rice on this? >> Thank you, your honor. Does Bosquin also have a pilot agreement? >> Boss Quinn has a pilot agreement. Y and and actually the value that I'm developing for the reval is done being done. Uh I met with Chad Roers. Um he's with Avatar Associates and he does the value for for Brier. We work together on it because we're diving up the value uh correctly. So there no either uh that collectively the two communities are not overvaluing it. >> Thank you. Any other questions? Mr. Rice. Seeing none. Thank you, Mr. Rice. >> I'll now open the public hearing. Is there anyone who would like to testify on item 26F? >> Seeing none, I'll close the public hearing. Madame city clerk. Uh item 26G. It is a discretionary preservation easement renewal request per RSA 79D for property located at 102 Little Pond Road owned by Sylvia Miscoco Trust. >> Mr. Acting City Manager >> and I will ask John Rice to come back one more time this evening. >> All right. So, this is a barn preservation easement uh for uh 102 Little Pond Road. Uh the MSOs own the property. Very well known uh at least in my office in town. Um you have seen this before. They've had two uh prior year uh pri prior um easements. They are for 10 years. So they've had it for 20 years. Uh we did inspect the barn. We always do an inspection uh of the property and we score them and we make a recommendation. Uh this is if you've ever seen the property or the barn, you've you're very fortunate. Is very well-kept barn uh in excellent condition. They are very expensive to maintain and that's really the idea of the easement is for us to be sure that what they say they are doing they are doing to the property. um they are doing quite a bit of work and uh it's getting more and more expensive to preserve the barn and therefore our recommendation as you'll see is outstanding as it's been in the past and this is for another 10 years. >> Thank you, Mr. Rice. Any questions for Mr. Rice? >> Seeing none. Thank you very much. >> I'll open the public hearing on item 26G. Is there anyone who'd like to public hearing. Madam City clerk, this brings us to the public hearing action phase item 27. >> It is an ordinance amending the code of ordinances, title one, general code, chapter 14, morals and conduct. >> Move approval. >> Moved and seconded. Any discussion? Council Brown. >> Yes. Um, I uh believe that I am making a motion that we table this until we receive additional information. I'm concerned that we've prioritized um we've prioritized social districts over uh warming stations, cooling centers, um over things that are s that do um necessitate the safety of our residents. Are you making You're making a motion, counselor? >> I am making a motion. >> Okay. Is there a second? >> Okay. The motion fails for lack of a second. >> Your honor, may I continue discussion? >> No, ma'am. You made your motion. >> Okay. I made a motion, but I would like to No second. >> Okay. We're still Are we in the discussion phase? >> There is no motion on the table. >> My motion is on the table, your honor. >> That's right. I'm sorry. Yes. Councelor Kovich, please. >> Yes. Well, I would like to speak to that. >> Speak to that motion. Very well. Um, I would like to point out that a member of the safety board is also a lobbyist for an alcoholic organization and I would like to know if this uh lobbyist disclosed that during any of the five meetings that the safety board had about social districts because I I think that is that is a concern. There were uh two members of the safety board that opposed moving forward that asked that this be slowed down. One of them was a former member of the DEIJB committee. I think that the safety board did not discuss the open carry and concealed carry um effect um that we have in New Hampshire and how alcohol that the impact of alcohol in our downtown where people are allowed to carry a weapon without a permit concealed. And also, as we heard from the person who testified, that there are fewer people who are drinking. In fact, the New Hampshire liquor commission is losing alcohol sales. The sales that are growing year overyear are non-alcoholic. So, I think we will be alienating a large group of people uh in conquered people who uh do not want to be around a bunch of drunk people walking around. We have not explored the impact of trash on this. I think that this uh does not need to be rushed forward over other issues particularly heating uh centers and warming centers and cooling stations. I just I feel that that the prioritization of a social district over other things um is concerning. >> Okay. Thank you, councelor. Any other discussion? Councelor Grady Sex. >> Thank your honor. I'll just say that all of those um issues were discussed at length in multiple subcommittees as well as with the full public safety advisory board. Thank you. >> Thank you, councelor. Any other discussion? Councelor Schultz. >> Thank you, Mr. Mayor. I want to thank um uh the citizen who testified because um I've heard some of the same arguments from our state representatives who also were at the hearings for that on the commerce committee. I'm not talking about myself. Um that felt that this issue was very well discussed, debated um with all of those issues in mind and I think that the folks who looked at this on our committees I trust uh this recommendation to move forward. So I I appreciate that opportunity. Thank you. >> Thanks. Right, Council Caleb. >> Yes. Um, in thinking about the permits and fees and all of that that will be associated with these social districts, potentially uh implementing the social districts could be some sort of revenue generator. So, I just wanted to throw that out as a reminder. >> Thank you, councelor Councelor Curts. >> Yeah, thank you. I'd also I will be supporting this motion. Um, I don't have any sense that this has been rushed. In fact, I know there were some organizations in the community who were hopeful to make use of social districting um earlier this summer um and the committee was careful in um working with legal to make sure that the city has a well-developed process um and all of the sort of safeties in place and the discretion of the council remains um intact for assessing those. So, this does not feel um like a rush to me at all and I will be supporting the motion. >> Council, >> uh I would echo what councelor Curts had to say. I believe Mr. Conford also noted we still probably have a very long process ahead of us with multiple more committees multiple times probably coming to the council and a reminder that our constituents did actually vote for us to do this in the long run. So, >> council key. >> Thank you, honor. And I'll just add uh not only is this not rush, this has been delayed beyond belief and uh time needs to come and obstructionist uh talk like councelor Brown just blows my mind. So I'll I'll be in favor of this. >> Of course you will. >> Counc. Thank you, your honor. Um I'll be supporting this mostly because um I think that I want to support our our local businesses, especially those that um serve alcohol. They have um restaurant servers who are licensed to do so and they are still responsible for the poor services poor ring services that you can shake your head counselor that's okay but >> I can support this motion on on behalf of our residents that asked for this. >> Thank you councelor Todd. >> Thank you. Uh I'll be supporting this also. I just want to comment that the ordinance I think is although it's been acknowledged that it's a rather simple ordinance but it's well written and I think that uh I have every faith and confidence that the way it's set up with uh these applications being submitted first to the public safety board uh is an excellent process and I have every confidence that the uh public safety board chair and members will u you know efficiently review each application and then provide the council with the appropriate information to in order for us to make a decision. So, thank you. >> Thank you. Any other comments? Councelor Grady St. >> Thank you, honor. Just one last um statement. The members of the public safety advisory board work very hard. This is a time-intensive um advisory board to serve on and I am just grateful for all of them and I I'm very sorry that somebody may have been um disparaged this evening. >> Thank you. Uh let me just say uh that I too will be voting in favor of this. I want to thank uh councelor Grady Ston, the chairman of the public safety advisory board for the work that she and her committee did on this. Uh it was indeed a long and detailed process. I have to say that the people who have reached out to me asking uh whether when we be when we will be able to have social districts are largely from our nonprofit community. uh they're all very eager to look at the opportunities this might serve for them and uh as has already been said some have been disappointed that uh that we haven't acted with more elacrity uh so that they could start using uh social districts sooner but I think that there has been concern council Grey Sex and I certainly have had offline conversations about wanting to be sensitive to neighborhoods and to uh public safety and to ensuring that uh when we do this we do it the right way and don't feel compelled to be rushed by the fact that Laconia has established one before us. As I told the paper, this is not a race. This is making public policy that sound. So, I will be voting in favor of it. Are we ready for the vote? All those in favor of the motion, please signify by saying I. >> I. >> Oppos? No. >> The eyes have it. >> Madam city clerk, item number 28. >> There is no action needed on that. >> That is Thank you. See I to yes there's no action required. So we'll move right to item 29. >> That is a resolution appropriating the sum of $67,376 trust and accepting the same from the Boys and Girls Club of Central and Northern New Hampshire. >> Moved and seconded. Is there discussion? >> Yes. I had wanted to ask which trust this was going to. I believe that was stated that it is going into the highway trust. >> It's a highway >> reserve reserve. >> Highway reserve. Thank you. >> Are we ready for the vote? All those in favor, please signify by saying I >> opposed. No. Eyes have it. >> Uh the motion passes by the necessary twothirds majority. Madam city clerk, item number 30. It is a resolution appropriating the sum of $11,500 in the parks and recreation miscellaneous grants and donations project for the free summer concert series and accepting the sum of $11,500 as a donation from the Walker lecture series for this purpose. >> Council Horn. >> I just want to show my appreciation for expanding to the Canal Street Riverfront Park. I've spent a lot of time at the left music down there. It's fun to go have a picnic with my daughter, go over, grab an ice cream, and there's been some really great music. So, just really thankful for that. >> Pleased to see it, too. >> All right. Any further discussion? >> All right. All those in favor, please signify by saying I. >> Opposed? No. The eyes have it. The motion passes by the necessary twothirds majority. Madam, city clerk, item 31. exemption for the city of conquered >> Councelor Curts. >> Thank you. So, I'd just like to um state some appreciation for the assessing department um both for um really taking a close look at this um and also I'm I I appreciate that they're keeping the door open to make adjustments if necessary, but also that it seems um they have been very accurate in the estimates that they've offered this community. Um, and I know we did receive some testimony from individuals in the community who really rely on this and they appreciated uh, excuse me, they expressed great appreciation for the elderly exemption um, and the way that it has allowed them to remain in the community in previous years. So, I just wanted to extend gratitude to staff for their hard work on this. >> Any other councelor Curts? >> Schultz. >> Schultz. [laughter] >> I don't know what this means, Mr. Mayor. Sorry. >> You have been doing so well for many months. I don't I think you owe me a steak dinner. >> I do. >> Um, [laughter] relax. >> I don't know what other jokes to make, but I'll leave it at that. >> I'll even throw in a cocktail if it's your [laughter] >> only in the social district. Um I I just wanted to also I attended one of the meetings um but as a citizen and I realized as I'm sitting there that the roughly 100 people that apply actively for this exemption that get 100% exemption. I'm related to them. I gain no benefit uh from this whatsoever. I am just shocked that it's such a low number and I do believe it's at least double that that would qualify possibly triple that. And so if we as counselors and elected officials can help get the word out that folks still have time to um I believe do that exemption process that we should encourage folks to do so because uh why leave it to just the 100 or so people when it could be more than Thank you, >> I just would point out that there's also the veterans, um, the disabled, the blind, solar. There are many exceptions. So, if you go on the assessing website, all your applications are right there. favor uh of the motion, please signify by saying I >> opposed. No. >> Eyes have it. Madam City clerk, item 31, I'm sorry, item 32. It is a report from the director of assessing recommending the city manager to be authorized to enter into a payment in l of taxes agreement between the city of conquered and brier hydro associates. >> Councelor Todd. >> Just a quick acknowledgement of another example of the great value Panakook brings to the city. [laughter] >> I was surprised you didn't say anything about the summer concerts. >> Oh, that's I'm saving that for my other comment. >> Oh, okay. All right. All right. Any any other discussion? Right. Ready for the vote. All those in favor, please signify >> Oppos? No. Eyes have it. The mo the motion passes. Madam city clerk, item 33. >> It is a discretionary preservation easement renewal request for property located at 102 Little Pond Road owned by the Sylvia Miscoco Trust. Move approval. I'll just say briefly that while I was on the board of the New Hampshire Preservation Alliance, uh preservation, barn preservation was uh was one of the priorities. We're losing many more barns uh in historic barns in New England and in New Hampshire than uh than we should and this program uh this state program is one of the tools we have to preserve them. So, I'm glad to see that we are supporting this effort as a city. >> All those in favor of the motion, please >> I. I >> Eyes have it. The motion passes. This brings us to the report section of our meeting. Uh I believe Mr. Acting City Manager, we have item 34, uh a report on White Park Pond restoration. >> We do. And I would like to ask Mr. Gil to come up and uh present this report. Welcome, >> Mayor, members, city council. Um, Garrison Beck is also here. He is our wetlands uh specialist from BHB who's helped us through the um application process for the pond. So, if there's any technical questions, he is better suited than I am. Um back in uh June is also um we wrote a report that you accepted that we would go back to the state to see if they would um allow us to uh hydro rake the pond versus a fuel dredge. Fuel dredge was significantly more dollars. I'm happy to report that the state has come back and said that is an allowable and a good use of um to get the pond back to where it needs to be. Um, so in the the CIP there was $200,000 in this year's budget that you've approved pending coming back for a discussion and final approval with you. Um, so it's in CIP51. >> Thank you. Thank you, Mr. Gil. Uh, any questions for Mr. Gil? >> Brown. >> Yes. Um, we can dredge this, but there's no guarantee that it will eradicate the lotus seed because it has a lifespan of like or um dormcancy period, right, of 13 years. It can just kind of sit there. So, this is something that we could be doing over and over again. Is that right? >> Um, even with a full dredge, there's no guarantee that you would get rid of um all the seeds. That's that's what garrison's here. So, I mean, even if we spent 700 to a million dollars, there's no guarantees that we're going to get >> Um, so part of it is, and he's here to he's educated us, part of it is if it's um if you guys approve it is um continuation on our staff to make sure when we see a plant um early on that we have to um basically go in there and our waiters and remove it. Um there will be um some process on our staff to make sure if we see anything to to get it follow up. Yes. I I thought that uh in previous council meetings we had talked about hydro raking was less than $20,000. It was like $15,000. >> That's harvesting. Um the past what we've been doing for the past five years to control the lotus plant is mechanically harvest. That's when the machine comes in and just kind of cuts the top six to eight inches off. Um, hydro raking is, and Harrison can probably do a better job explaining it to me, but it's it's a back hole on a barge that goes down and gets all sediments up and gets all the root zones and everything. It's a little bit more aggressive. >> Now, this is um is this this is increasing the depth from 3 feet to 10 feet or this is not? >> That keeps the same [clears throat] depth. Okay. >> Yeah, keeps the same depth. >> The depth averages I think is between four and six feet. right now. Back in the 80s, it was over 10 feet and that half of the dredge um did lower it brought in a lot of fill to about five feet. >> Any other questions? Councelor Foot. >> Thank you, your honor. Um could you explain why uh you didn't pursue or maybe you did a chemical alternative to to kill this plant off versus what you're doing? I'm going to date myself now. I think it was probably 10 or 12 years ago. We um used chem we did a chemical spray um and it was not well received at all by the community. Um so we um went this way and I think it was also a better way to remove the seed bankank was to remove the material. I'm also happy to speak to that. Um, one of the concerns with the chemical treatment is all that pond material will die in place and that could prompt algae blooms if you have all that decomposting material in the pond remaining in the pond. So, by removing the the mass of the plant material from the pond, um it's less chemically intensive and removing that plant material doesn't um wouldn't spur potential algae blooms or other unintended consequences. >> C foot, >> great response. Thank you, >> Cass Brown. And Mr. Gil, would you please pull your microphone a little closer to you? I can hear you, but I'm sure people at home can. Thank you. >> I have residents asking about the smell, and it looks like on page five, you're talking about um dredging and then it needs to sit on site to dewater um before being transported off site. So, is there going to be an excessive smell with this? >> Um if approved, we're doing it hopefully in late September when it's cooler. Um, but you do have a large biomass that need to dewater. There will be some smell. >> Follow. >> Did we do this uh maybe 10 years ago? Because I remember a mound um out where the new playground is an enormous mound because my kids were playing on it and they were about it was about 10 years ago. >> Um >> it was dredged and it was it had the lotus seeds. Yeah, it was pretty it was gross and it was huge. >> I think that was the first time um I don't think the lotus plant was there. I think we tried to dredge it um for ice skating. Um but it was up where the the playground and the splash pad was. It was a large material. >> Yes. And was that follow that was high was that hydro raking? >> No, that was with a backhoe trying to remove some of the growth. >> Good memory. Any other questions for Mr. Gil or uh sorry, Mr. >> I have a question for Mr. Lebron. >> I'm sorry. >> All right. >> Um I believe that there's 500,000 of uh funds for CIP51 that was approved but not bonded. Is that correct? >> Is this relevant council? Is this relevant to >> Well, I'm just concerned that it's, you know, we're this is now $700,000 for White Park that is going to be dedicated. >> So, you don't want to spend money in your neighborhood park? >> It's a lot of money. >> It is. >> Yeah. [clears throat] >> Are we ready for the vote? >> There's no vote. >> I don't have a >> It's just a report. >> Uh, no. No. I'm sorry. I I I'm I'm seeking a motion to authorize staff >> to hydro rake >> the pond in White Park. >> So moved. Second. >> Moved and seconded. All right. All in >> Eyes have it. >> Thank you, gentlemen. >> Uh next report is item 35. [clears throat] This is report uh from the UNH sustainability fellow on the citywide tree canopy assessment. Beth Fence Marker will join us and make the presentation. >> Thank you. Thank you. >> Good evening, Mayor and City Counselors. Um while Danielle sets up, I'll just give an introduction. So, this is our fifth year with a fellow from the UNH sustainability institute. Um previous years, she they've done greenhouse gas emission projects. Um worked on community [clears throat] power. Uh, one of the recommendations that came out of the last greenhouse gas project was to get a better understanding of what the citywide canopy was and what our um, natural resources were. So, our project this year was a mapping project um, an assessment of the citywide um, tree canopy assess assessment, excuse me, the citywide tree canopy and looking at different ways to quantify that and what the benefits are to the city. Um, so I'll I'll pass it over. This is Danielle Melius. She just graduated from UNH and she's on her way to Toronto in a couple weeks where she'll be pursuing her master's degree at the University of Toronto. Um, she's done an amazing job and I'm really proud of her. So, I'm sad she's leaving us. >> Thank you, Beth. It's a pleasure to meet you all. I've met some of you uh throughout the summer, but it's really great to be here. I know it's at the end of the night so I'll make it a little brief but we um as Beth mentioned we our goal was to map the canopy which we were able to do which we found that around 60% of conquered is covered by tree canopy which as someone from Connecticut I would not think that Hartford and New Haven could compare to that. Um we also found that there was there unsurprisingly has been a a decrease in the amount of tree canopy cover since 1985. Um, but we still have about 30,000 uh acres of tree canopy throughout the city of conquered. Um, with about 35% of that canopy being on public land and the rest of it being on private land, which is important to mention as we could plant a tree everywhere we can as part of the city of conquered, but eventually we'd run out of space and it would be up to the private property owners to put their hand in the game and to plant their own trees. But the goal of this project was to also provide resources for people who want to plant more trees, whether it be they don't know how to what trees to plant. They don't know where they could plant them. Um, educating people on the advantages of planting native species over um non-native or invasive ones. We also looked at different risk and benefits that comes with tree canopies, whether that be with um decreasing the amount of flood risk or lowering the amount of urban heat island or urban heat temperatures. um planting in areas that are are when it comes to the entire landscape permeability um planting in areas that are not as permeable to the wildlife because those are the [clears throat] areas that you'll you're more likely to see those wildlife vehicle vehicle collisions as animals have to leave their can their forests to to um sorry to uh move to different areas through the wildlife corridors that we all know we have in the city of conquered. So um by taking these different benefits we were able to look at it as an analysis by ward and with that we were able to prioritize different benefits. We can look at them all in general or we could say we um we want to plant uh for the most cooling benefits. We want to plant for the most flood uh for the most uh air quality benefits or noise pollution. Um and we were a we also found that there was an increase in the in the surface temperature. So possibly that could be a great way to start of trying to decrease the amount of heat that the pavement or the city urban areas are releasing. So as many of you know this could anyone could use this project whether that be someone who just wants to see what of conquered is canopy uh which areas have seen canopy loss and maybe what are those causes. Um it could be for the residents who want cooler temperatures. it gets hotter and hotter every year and our air conditioning bills go up and up and up and I I know I'd want to save some money on that. um they can the wildlife of course can benefit by in increasing the landscape permeability along with other cities can use this as a framework to map their own tree canopies because as Beth said and a lot of the I worked in a group of greenhouse gas emissions fellows and many of them were seeing the exact same issue that we had seen previously with the fact that they were lacking the information on the tree canopy which as many of you probably assume provides a lot of benefits when it comes to greenhouse gas emissions. We also saw um being able to use a platform called iTree Canopy, we were able to figure out that there is $18.4 million worth of total annual annual benefits just in conquered tree canopy, which is amazing. And um while I only had a while I only had a summer to do this um thankfully this um project can be used in the future whether it be figuring out what types of trees or what sorry what size trees can you plant within a certain area because you can figure out where what areas are plantable and then you have to figure out well they have to be a certain distance from the road or fire hydrants or power poles. Um, and by taking certain radius of buffers, you can see which size of each you can put within an area, whether that be on the sides of streets or in someone's lawn if that's what they're interested in. Um, [clears throat] sorry. And we can also start with this recommendations because obviously I spent my summer doing this virtually. Um and with this project we can take people who are in the field forestry members who could do this on the ground research and make this classification and this data even more um robust and accurate because again you can only do so much from imagery that again our most recent one was 2023. So with this could it can be a really great starting point for possible future analysis of the urban tree canopy and to make and for the future priority planting of where we should plant more trees for the most benefit. So part of the main part of my um project was this dashboard which anyone with a screen would be able to access um they'd be able to zoom in zoom out. The left side being the citywide ca the citywide sorry the citywide information and the right side being ward. Um if we zoom in you have to let it load a little bit. Um but once it's making me look bad. >> Wow. >> This is once you zoom in you're able to see a more detailed. It's of course not perfect because no ortho imagery or maps are perfect especially when you only have virtual or online data. But we can also look at it on the ward scale which would involve us. Um this is the the uh priority planting of the darker the color the the first um the higher the priority for planting. And anyone who wants to learn about their ward can go and click on a ward and it'll give once it'll load the specific information for each ward. Um along with looking at the different layers there's a lot more when it comes. We have the canopy when it comes to urban versus rural, private versus public. Um we can look at the possible areas of planting. Uh the historic canopy areas that have gained or lost canopies since 1985. We can look at the urban heat island which includes data from 2013. Um and overall it just provides a place for anyone whether or not you're uh working for the city of conquered or just someone who lives there and wants to learn more about the nature that they're surrounded. We'll also be able to provide links to places where they could figure out when where to start when it comes to planting more trees or those other resources with encouraging people to plant those native plant species and to plant pollinator gardens to to just um sorry to benefit them and the rest of the city of >> Is this all your work? >> Is this dashboard your work? >> Yes. Outstanding. >> This is incredible. I'm sorry to interrupt you, but needed to take a breath. >> Yeah, [laughter] sorry. >> This is incredible work. >> Just incredible and incredibly has such potential to be useful for the city. >> Yeah, >> that is awesome. >> But yeah, that's pretty much it. So I'm hoping that this can be a platform for the possibly the future fellows, the future forestry members to build off of it to make it to improve it better than because this is my first time doing this as well. So people to build off of it to make improvements and to be able to take it because the only platform that I use that you have to pay for is RGS Pro. And if you there's free alternatives that if someone who has a large amount and wants to map their own canopy, they could do that easily online with the pro provided uh information methodology which I'm also writing. >> Beth, is this going to be available on the city? >> Yes. So um Yep. So, we're meeting with Amy Willlet, the um acting GIS coordinator, tomorrow morning just to figure out how to get all the data over to the city system. It'll be up on our website. Um we have conquered.govtes where we currently have most of our tree information. We'll be updating that with all of Danielle's research. Um I will say that we she presented to the rest of the fellows last week and a lot of the other m municipalities were very jealous. um they really like this project and um we'll be sharing this out with the other communities that were part of the New England Municipal Sustainability Network. Um her methodology so this can be replicated in other places across New England. >> I'm sorry I monopolize things because I was so impressed other questions. Council Todd, >> thank you your honor. Yeah, I just uh I I certainly agree with everything that the mayor said. Uh it's very impressive and it looks like it's going to be really useful. Um, and I also really appreciate the way it was done because, you know, dividing it by wards is very helpful to all of us because we can, you know, focus on a par one. I'm in the red zone there. So, I'm I'm especially going to be interested once it's up and running to be able to look at that more closely and then try to figure out ways to engage with the public so that they can become uh, you know, more knowledgeable of what the potential is. And I know that Miss Fenceer will help you with that also. always. >> Uh so uh just just a quick comment which is um also uh I don't really have a question I guess uh because you answered my question when where is it going to be available to us uh but just uh thank you for doing the work that you do. I think it's really valuable work. I wish you all the best of luck in the future and thank you for your work here helping the city with this project. Very much appreciate it. >> Thank you. It's my absolute pleasure. I had a wonderful summer. >> Yes. This is incredible. As a member of the tree committee I love this. Now, you'd said that it it you're using data from 1985 up until what period? Like there were just 255 trees cut down this year. Is that reflected on this? >> Um the most recent data we have is until 2023. >> Any other comments or questions? >> Actually, follow up. >> Yes. Uh will this do is this something that you have to manually update? >> Yes. Okay. >> Um as Beth mentioned, I will make sure they have access to everything and but many of the stuff is very easily updatable with web maps or um web dashboards. So all you have to do is update one thing and it'll update the rest. >> Awesome. Thank you so much. >> Can I just Oh, sorry. >> All right. Well, thank you so so much. I'm sorry. >> I do not want to take away from Danielle at all. I just want to remind us that this very minuscule investment for this fellowship is something we took out of our budget and will not have access to next year. >> It's a point well. >> Can I just add one more comment? Yeah. >> I just want to make sure it's unders. So she went through a color analysis to make sure that um this was accessible for all. So there was the color blindness test that was done. So some of the I said why is it green and pink? and she said, "Well, because of the way the colors are viewed in the different grade." So, I just want to put that out there that is meeting our accessibility requirements for color. >> Um, what is the what is the investment um for the sustainability fellow? What do we what do we pay to get this incredible person and product? >> So, last year we the past five years we paid $4,000 per year. Um, but UNH changed the structure of the program. So, it was it's going to be a lot more expensive in the future. Um, that we were able to get additional funding this past year to help us cover the change the program last year. So, we have Danielle this summer. Um, we had I had started conversations with other organizations that potentially they could sponsor a fellow for the city. Um, >> and there there are organizations out there that could potentially we could do >> Uh, what is the total cost? Like you said, there's going to be an increase. How much is that? >> Last year it increased to 12,000. >> Wow. Well, yeah, that makes sense. Thank >> That's great. I have one more question. Do you have any relatives in the clergy? >> I I know other Melases and it's a very unusual name. So, >> just curious folks that I traped around Nicaragua with. So, >> yeah. >> Well, thank you. Thank you so much. I'll entertain a motion to accept the report. >> So moved. >> Moved and seconded. All in favor? >> I have the accept. The report is accepted. [applause] >> This takes us uh to consideration of items pulled from the consent calendar. Madam city clerk, item 22. This was pulled from the consent agenda by councelor Kredovvic and councelor Brown. It's a report from the Beaver Meadow Director of Operations recommending approval of proposed 2027 Beaver Meadow Golf Course rate structures as recommended by the Golf Course Advisory Committee at their July 9th, 2026 meeting. >> Moved and seconded. Discussion. >> Thank you, your honor. Um, members of the council, the proposed rate structure is expected to generate approximately $91,000 in additional revenue for the 2728 season. You'll recall during our budget discussions that the projected revenue over expenses for fiscal year 2026 was more than double what it was the year prior. That number for fiscal year 2025 was roughly $124,000. While we've not closed our fiscal year yet on 26, the gain is substantial. Now, consider an additional $91,000 above this in some. This is exactly the trajectory that we have wanted our golf course to be on while we are looking to open up our new uh clubhouse in the fall. At the same time, our rates remain competitive. The juniors continue to have significant opportunities to participate. We're growing the game of golf for women and attracting golfers away from our competitors. The question is not simply whether any individual rate has increased, but more importantly if the overall rate structure is reasonable, competitive, affordable, and financially responsible. Our daily fees um some of the daily fee increases are higher than the rate of inflation. However, the appropriate comparison is to the local market. Beaver metal remains competitive with the area courses. The uh season passholder rates, most proposed increases are modest. They're roughly two to 3%. These increases are at or below the current rate of inflation. The junior passholder rate remains unchanged at $450. junior golfers and youth participation is such an important part of Beaver Meadow Golf Course and we need to look beyond the numbers of our junior season passholders which we have seen in decline over this past year but we also think we have a very specific identifiable reason for that which is the Bank of America youth oncourse program it's performed exceptionally well and we've been able to see the benefits of that this summer what this program does and we learned about this last year is a youth on course pays $5 for a round of nine holes of golf and Bank of America picks up the other $8 for the cost of that round. Basically, what we've done is found an affordable way to involve juniors in the game of golf and we see that it's working. A reminder that our revenue also comes from the driving range, the cart rentals, simulator league, and rentals in the winter and our tournaments, especially from our local nonprofit organizations who are able to fund raise for their support of their mission throughout the year. And so I would ask you in supporting the recommendation from the Gulf Advisory Board that every year looks at these rates very thoughtfully and very mindful of what this impact is to the city and to our city taxpayers. Thank you. >> Thank you, councelor. Councelor Brown. >> Yes. Thank you for um asking people to consider this impact on taxpayers because the council should remember that the golf fund continues to have a substantial reliance on taxpayers. The current debt service for just this year for capital projects on taxpayers is $764,000. That's just on taxpayers. $764,000 this year. That's more than a match for the skate house. That's more than renovating a pool. That is just for the golf course. And these projects, we are in debt until 2046. So these rates do not meet those costs. The users are not funding these costs. The debt service goes until 2046. And there are multiple um discounted and complementaryary memberships that are happening. There are employees that are that are able to play there. The New Hampshire Golf Association continues to use the course for free. Um and there were 400 rounds that were donated to um other organizations for marketing purposes. We have seen nothing that talks about the return on investment. If we were to have charged for those 400 rounds that is a value between 14,000 and 38,000 this council I think it was just last month they we paid $22,000 from savings for a backflow pretor. So this is money that we are leaving on the table. I have not seen. We should have the information a return on investment for all of these deeply discounted rates. Uh the let's see the Yeah, I just um I'm astounded that we continue to pour so much money into the golf course when we have a uh public information officer that we are not using. We are giving away golf for marketing purposes. Uh this is this cost is then going on to taxpayers. It's not being recouped. These rates we can hold off and we can say to the Gulf Advisory Committee, come back and have rates that will cover the cost. This is a special revenue fund. The water and wastewater are enterprise funds. The rates for those are going up. They're going up 9% 20% next year because the users are paying those rates. The golf fund should be the same. If we are seeing steep increases to pay for water and wastewater, there is no reason why the golf fund cannot have the users fund their own course. >> Councelor Horn. >> Um maybe Mr. Luran. The golf carts seem to be the only category that didn't have any increase. Was there a reasoning behind that particular? >> We had a substantial increase last year. If you recall, um we were at the end of our contract with the uh rental fleet for the carts. Um and the cost of that rental fleet was going up substantially. So we increased that pricing considerably last year in order to uh support the additional cost for that uh lease payment. So we thought that this year and this was discussed at the um golf advisory committee this year. It made sense to hold that rate steady because of the substantial increase last year and then take a look at it again next year to look at the rate projections as we go forward. >> Other discussion ready for the [clears throat] vote. All those in favor of the motion as presented, please >> I no. I >> The motion uh is adopted. Motion passes. Uh madam city clerk, item 23. It is a resolution rescending Oh, excuse me. It was pulled from consent by council Brown. It's a resolution rescending the appropriation of the sum of $434,334.50 in various community development block grant and grant donations projects to include $8,725 $25.82 82 in community development block grant fund and $425,6869 in the grants and donations fund. Rescending the acceptance of $434,334.50 in various community development grant and grants and donations funds including $8,725.82 82 in community development block grant fund and $425,6868 in the grants and donations fund retroactive to June 30th. >> That's [laughter] I I move that we give some oxygen to >> you poor thing. >> Yes. I had questions that I was unable to um reach out to staff regarding um these. Uh so this is the second year that we are doing this and I um recognize in the report it states that that these were hanging on from 2007 to 2026. And I'm wondering why we did not close out some of these um last year when we did this. Some of them could have been closed out last year. There might have been a variety of reasons that they were left on the books during that time. Um but this year we've worked hard in order to finish cleaning up the uh remaining items that are um still out there as an authorization, but um no anticipation of spending the money or getting any revenue back from it. So this is not like we're giving up money. It's just money that you know really hasn't been spent and there's not going to be any uh application for any additional funds for it. >> Followup. Are there any So after doing this kind of cleanup, are there any other um outstanding um grants beyond 2026? >> Uh yeah, you're going to we're going to have grants all the time. And uh basically what we do is we're going to take a look at them each and every year like we do we've been doing it with the capital close out for many years. We haven't been doing it with grant closeout until last year. Um so this is going to continue on. you know, we think we've cleaned up the majority of the long outstanding items. You know, this is kind of a housekeeping thing. Um, so you'll still see additional items come forward. Um, you know, something that was approved that were no longer needed. You know, those will be uh brought forward in future years for the city council to take action to deauthorize that funding so that there's no funds spent against it when there's no uh chance of getting the dollars back as well. So, >> Mr. Mr. Acting city manager, can I kind of paraphrase? You tell me whether uh I'm saying this correctly. The majority of these funds are funds that have been granted to us uh on a reimbursement basis. So, we have to spend the money, then we go to the federal government, whoever the granter is, and they pay us back [clears throat] what we've spent. And what we're doing here is cleaning up. Say we had a $300,000 grant, but uh we only spent $250,000 dollars of it and we're reimbursed the $250,000 by the federal government. Well, we still have $50,000 on the book, but it's not it's not money sitting in an account in most instances. There are a couple of instances here where uh there is money and the recommendation is to put it into the revolving loan fund uh which is used for housing purposes uh and short-term grants or low interest grants. Correct. >> You did an amazing job explaining [laughter] that. I hope during the rest of my career here I'll be able to learn. >> As long as you keep buying me coffee. >> You got it. >> That's correct. Uh, I had not pulled item number 24, but I was curious if any of these could have been applied to item number 24. >> Completely different things. This really doesn't correlate to that. >> All right. Any other questions? >> Move. Move the question. >> Vote. I think we're ready to take the vote. >> All those in favor, please signify by saying I. >> I. No. Eyes have it. The uh motion is approved. Motion passes. Uh this brings us to the comments section. We'll start this time around with >> Fair. >> Got me off guard there. Uh two quick things. Uh one is uh last I think it was a week ago tonight out great community event at Rollins Park attended by a number of people in in the community and from afar. So, it was a nice showing by our public safety people and community members and the different groups that um had displays. And then secondly, um it's my understanding that um Deputy Chief Steve Mula retired and uh I didn't know until after the fact and uh he's out listening to this, which I'm sure he's probably not. Congratulations. Thank you for your service and best of luck. >> Thank you, Council Foot. Council PR. >> Yes. I hope everyone has an opportunity to get over to the sunflower festival. Um it is just an absolutely incredible um field that is transformed. The sunflowers are so beautiful. They look fake. The flowers attract everyone from all over. I had an opportunity to attend the dinner and there were there was a couple who came up from Arlington Mass and they said that that dinner was equimed in New York, Long Island that cost $450. This one was $130. So, I hope everyone um has an opportunity to go to the Sunflower Fest, see the vendors there. It's it's only the fourth year, but they have truly transformed that space. Um, and it's beautiful. We are the Sunflower City because of them. >> Cosa. >> Yeah, I just have a brief appreciation for parks and recreation. There's been really a lot of activity in Rollins Park. Uh, there's a pollinator festival that was really wonderful. Obviously, Jeff Councelor Foot mentioned the National Night Out which had many people there. Sunday there was an arts festival with music which was really wonderful and then the music in the park and I know other parks have had music festivals and so it was really fun to to use our parks in the summer and have people come out and enjoy it. So thank you to all the parks and recreation team. >> Council Caleb. >> Okay, so uh there's an exciting event this week. Um the Black Heritage Trail of New Hampshire will be unveiling its first marker in conquered to honor baseball player and founding member of the Sunset League Billy Thompson. um who was a conquered resident beginning in 1890. Um this event is taking place at White Park this Wednesday the 12th at 6 PM. Um there's another awesome event coming up uh Franco Fest um on August 22nd which is uh going to be a celebration of French and French diaspora cultures. Um I heard or I saw online they were the recipient of the event arts grant this year um which helped make this cultural celebration uh free for the public to attend. So definitely check it out. It's at Kimell Jenkins. There's food, activities, music, etc. Um, and let's see, I had a couple of words of some words of appreciation. Uh, so first I want to give a shout out to our communications professionals at the city. Um, Stephanie Breton is the [clears throat] one behind um the uh city of conquered external communications and Angelina Zul Zulich Zulkage. >> Zulik Zulik. Oh, I'm so sorry. I'm so sorry. Angelita uh runs the general services communications. Um both are really such important jobs because they shape how the public gets information where they normally are which is you know social media online all of that. Um sort of the front line of interactions for the public and I'm sure that job can be quite challenging. Um, I love when they get creative with content and I saw a great post uh this past week um from general services about the repair of the water man on South Stage Street which I was so looking forward to. I'm so excited to that that work is um is completed and it was really cool to see the video that Angelina posted. Um >> I find that stuff really interesting and apparently so do a lot of other people online. So um keep up the great work Stephanie and Angelina. Um, and finally, I would like to acknowledge and thank the firefighters um, who welcomed myself and councelor Schultz on a few little station tours in the last few weeks. Um, we had the opportunity to tour these facilities, ask questions, and I know I I generally learned a lot about these operations. Um, which is an education that I know will uh, serve me well in the future. Um, so council and I went to station one central, uh, station 7, uh, the heights, and station five, Manor, and last, uh, but not certainly not least will be Broadway. Um, and one extra shout out to the manor because when we toured, um, I had just a couple days prior, uh, been with a friend who needed EMS transport to the hospital. Um, and they were the ones who responded to the call and um, I don't know when the last time was I was present for an EMS transport. Maybe never. Um, and it was a stressful moment. They came in and they had such a calming presence and their professionalism was, you know, not surprising at all. Um, but very much appreciated. Um, so thank you. That's all I got. Council Curts, Council Schultz. >> [snorts] >> the other curts. Just kidding. [laughter] I don't know. I'm in a snappy mood today. Um, speaking of communicators, I want to thank councelor Caleb for wonderful videos and coverage of those visits uh at our fire stations. You do a great job lifting up our city. Uh, and you do it for free and we appreciate it. Um, and I also enjoyed my visits. One more to go. Um, Mr. Philip Brun, is this your last council meeting with us? >> I don't know. Maybe I'm I don't want to preempt anything the mayor may say, but since you happen to be a constituent of mine in W 9, I just wanted to say how much I've enjoyed working with you in my short time on the council and um we all owe you a debt of gratitude for all you've done for the city and for the people of Conquered. So, thank you. >> Here, HERE. [applause] I know you don't do it for a thanks, but you got one anyway. Um, I'm also excited. This is a different kind of transition to say this, but um, Madame Clerk and her office have released the sample ballots for September 8th's uh, state primary. There are quite a few primaries in both parties. Um federal uh all the federal races have primaries in both parties. There is a wards five, six, seven, eight. The flotial race has a Democratic primary. There are quite a few Republican primaries up and down the ballot depending on your ward. So please check out your ballots ahead of time. I hope all eligible conquered voters will go and if you aren't registered, you can register at the polls. Um, and you can take that time to research the candidates that will be on the ballot because there are quite a few uh primaries on the ballot. And besides, it's fun to see who all is on on your what ballot you're going to get. You get a preview. Um, so thank you to the clerk's office and madame clerk and for your volunteers that are supervisor the checklist, etc. for all the hard work you do for us since we don't have a city council meeting before that day. So, >> Thank you, your honor. I walked out the door this morning to hold up this book that the DEIGB committee is reading, but it's not actually this book. It's called I Never Thought of It Way. I would recommend the members of the council, since I grabbed the wrong book, to grab the right book. Um it's really a nice read about how to have difficult conversations with people that are um have opposing views on a wide vine range of things. Uh, one of the things that struck me and I I run across this in human resources all the time is, you know, you're sitting at the water bubbler and someone will say, "Geez, you know, somebody keeps stealing all the toilet paper out of the restroom." And it's that moment of pause that somebody has to take toilet paper home because they can't afford it. And we need to rethink the way we sometimes have our conversations. It was really enlightening. I get to say I finished the book and I meant to bring it and I I was a total failure for our committee, but please don't fail us. Read it with us. Um it really is a good read. Second, I wanted to say I did bring this because Stephanie Breton printed it out for me. It's uh Golf with a Cop. This is um the counterpart to Ski with the Cop that we had over the winter with Ski the Bee. This is um in association with the volunteers and friends of the beef, but more importantly with our police department so that our youth in our community can get to know our police officers and the golf course has set up some wonderful games for the kids. Um it's a putting contest, a chipping contest, a driving range contest. So none of it is going to impact oncourse play, but it is um equipment provided and an opportunity to see how well our police officers perform with a putter or a chipper or a driver. And you'll notice that Bailey, our news dog, is holding a putter in the poster. It is on August 20th. It's from 4 to 6 PM. So, perfect time for those after school um after uh summer programs that the kids can come and really meet our police officers up front close and personal and play some fun games um out on the golf course uh practice areas. And the last thing I have is um the Sunflower Festival is an amazing um event in our city and I think it's a great opportunity for people to go and see the last contiguous piece of agricultural land that we have in Marramac County. We as the city council, we're the ones that protected that land under the Gully Hill Conservation Committee. And I think that we owe ourselves um a nice pat on the back for preserving this land, but also turning it into something that is um a little bit more [laughter] healthier for the soil as we reinvigorate the nitrates into the soil with the sunflowers and the lavender. And I can attest per my granddaughter, they have the biggest four-leaf clovers along the Marramac River Greenway Trail that she has ever, ever seen. So, I strongly recommend that you go and I can tell you from personal experience, there are thousands of them. So, go take the children uh they can pick fourleaf clover and really have a fantastic moment making a wish as they look at our state capital and enjoy our sunflower festival. Thank you. >> Thank you, council. Council, >> I would echo counselors Brown and Kredik on the sunflower festival. Um, we can enjoy it through Sunday. And I did track all of the tickets are sold out for the dinners, but they do have tickets left for the Sips and Sunnies event on Friday, which is New England Bluegrass Band Trio. You can go in over 21 age 21 plus. And you can enjoy drinks from Pors and Petals, which is the [clears throat] conquered based mobile bar that they have in there, and listen to music, look at the beautiful sunflowers, and have a great evening on Friday night. >> You councelor Todd. >> Yes. Thank you, your honor. As promised, I do want to I'm going to actually echo what Councelor Schloer said and give a shout out and extra thanks to our congregate parks and recck department as well for all their diligent work. Uh, you know, even throughout the the Fourth of July, the fireworks, I mean, You're right, the list goes on and on. Um, and it's all executed so well. And specifically, I want to uh just give another reference to the free parks concerts at the at our Canal Street Riverfront Park. Um, these are on on Wednesday, 6:30 to 8. And uh coming up on August 12th is Lee and Dr. G. August 26 is Lucas and the guys. And I specifically also want to uh give a real uh thanks and gratitude to the Walker, our friends at the Walker Lecture Fund for uh their continued support for these kind of concerts. It's uh it's just great to be able to, as Councelor Horn was uh describing, great to be able to have this available for our community to go to a concert, go next door, go get an ice cream or whatever it is and just be outside and enjoy the free music uh with a great view of the water as well. So uh so just uh thank you again to uh to Walker Lecture. Thanks. >> Well uh most of what I was going to say has already been touched upon by others. U I will however reiterate and encourage folks to come to White Park uh on Wednesday uh at 6 uh to uh be present for the unveiling of the Bill Thompson marker. his project which is uh very important to the city I think uh and the first I hope of several black heritage trail markers in conquered uh and uh he's not here right now but I do want to thank uh uh David Gil parks and rec director for all the work he put into it um as well as uh the black heritage trail of New Hampshire uh for being a great partner uh and also uh a number of civic-minded citizens who helped make this make it happen. I [clears throat] also do want to say this since this is your last city council meeting, Mr. Lebron. Uh I did not bring you a box of chocolates. Uh but I did bring you uh a a box of gratitude, a great big heaping box of gratitude. Uh in my uh now 13 years on city council, uh you have been a rock of stability, uh a reliable source of information, uh a master at uh budget analysis and budget explanation. Uh you are a big part of why this city has been successful. Um we have our moments, we have our challenges and we always will. uh but you certainly u have uh done uh sterling service to the city of new of conquered um and I wish you well in your retirement. Uh I want to express my appreciation for you delaying your retirement so that you could uh be acting [clears throat] city manager uh during the city manager sobbatical. Um, but I know that once uh you shake the dust off your uh shoes uh or sandals uh and uh go on to [clears throat] enjoying your retirement uh you can you'll be able to look back uh with a great deal of satisfaction and pride in what you've achieved here. So, thank you so much. >> [applause] >> I do would like I would like to say a couple things. Uh really run and it's uh thank you very much for the opportunity to work for the city of conquered. It's been great. I've had a great career here and I really appreciate all the work and effort that everybody does and I just want to remember that I want all everybody remember that there's a 500 people out there that are doing great work every single day. You know, I get to sit in that other chair, you know, once a month. You know, I I get to sit in my office, you know, I get sit up here once in a great while. Um, but there's really, you know, hundreds and hundreds of other people that are doing fantastic work and, you know, keep remembering them and all the work they do. But I appreciate the opportunity to work here. Thank you very much. >> Uh do I have a motion to adjurnn? >> Moved and seconded. Uh all those in favor signify by saying I >> Eyes have it. The meeting is adjourned.