Planning Board - 071426 DRAFT PB Minutes

The Planning Board approved meeting minutes from June 9, 2026, with a 6-0-0 vote. Following a public hearing on the 2026 Master Plan, Zach Shollar moved to continue public comments to the August 11, 2026, meeting; this motion passed 6-0-0. The Board conducted a non-binding design review for a proposed 20-unit apartment building at 14 Elm Street by Cheney East Company. No votes were taken on this development, but it was noted that Special Use Permits will be required for relief on building width and exceeding the 16-unit lot maximum. Bart McDonough reported the Town received a grant for Schanda Park planning and that the Rosa-Folletts Brook project is on track for October closing. The meeting adjourned at 10:02 PM via a 6-0-0 vote. Source: https://newmarketnh.api.civicclerk.com/v1/Meetings/GetMeetingFileStream(fileId=7805,plainText=false)

Document

1
Town Hall, 186 Main Street, Newmarket, NH 07/14/2026 Planning Board

2
PLANNING BOARD
3
Tuesday, July 14, 2026 at 7:00 PM
4
Town Hall, Council Chambers
5
DRAFT MEETING MINUTES
6

7
Present: Val Shelton (Chair), Zachary Shollar (Vice Chair), Jane Ford, Bill Arcieri, Jeff
8
Goldknopf, Justin Glazebrook (Town Council – Ex officio), Bart McDonough (Director of
9
Planning & Community Development)
10
Absent: Jamie Bruton, Eric Botterman (Alternate)
11

12
The Chair called the regular meeting to order at 7:04 PM.
13

14
The voting members will be: Val Shelton, Zach Shollar, Jane Ford, Bill Arcieri, Jeff Goldknopf,
15
Justin Glazebrook.
16

17
1.

Pledge of Allegiance
18

19
2.

Public Comments
20
The public comment was opened at 7:04 PM. There were no public comments for items not on
21
the agenda. The public comment was closed at 7:05 PM.
22

23
3.

Review & Approval of Minutes
24
a. June 9, 2026
25
Action
26
Motion:
Jeff Goldknopf moved to approve the minutes of June 9, 2026.
27
Second:
Jane Ford
28
Discussion: None
29
Vote:
Approved 6-0-0
30

31
4.

Regular Business
32
a. Pursuant to RSA 674:2-4 and Section 4.16 Town Master Plan of the Municipal Code of
33
the Town of Newmarket, notice is hereby given that the Planning Board will hold a public
34
hearing to review and adopt a new master plan comprising of the following chapters
35
enumerated hereinbelow, or take any other action relative thereto.
36
• 1. Vision, 2. Existing and Future Land Use, 3. Arts, Culture and Historic
37
Resources, 4. Community Facilities and Utilities, 5. Downtown Riverfront, 6.
38
Economic Development, 7. Energy, 8. Housing, 9. Land and Water Conversation,
39
10. Recreation, 11. Transportation.
40
The proposed master plan chapter amendments can be viewed by visiting the following
41
link below, or by visiting the Department of Planning and Community Development
42
located in Town Hall. (https://www.newmarketnh.gov/522/Draft-Master-Plan-2026-PDFs)
43
The Chair read the above into the record, and gave an overview of the process thus far
44
developing the Master Plan.
45
Kerrie Diers and Rachel Dewey with Strafford Regional Planning Commission introduced the
46
Master Plan and the new draft public-facing website for the chapters and themes. With the

2
Town Hall, 186 Main Street, Newmarket, NH 07/14/2026 Planning Board

47
website interface, it was shown how each topic has a tile to navigate to specific chapters. The
48
Arts, Culture and Historic Resources Chapter was presented as an example of a chapter
49
landing page. The Implementation Plan page was also shown, having an interactive map that
50
can organize information by chapter or theme, with it explained that the map can be updated as
51
often as the Town wishes.
52
The Chair asked regarding if there is a link to a spreadsheet showing the implementation goals.
53
It was confirmed that the spreadsheet can be added to the website.
54
Zach praised the heat map shown on the Implementation Plan page as a way for the public to
55
be able to see where items are focused.
56
Bill asked regarding updating the map; Rachel explained that it can be easily updated, and it is
57
tied to data through a spreadsheet on the back-end. Therefore, if an updated spreadsheet is
58
provided, it can be uploaded for updating the map through coordination with SRPC and Bart.
59
Zach also noted that the Long-Range Planning Subcommittee could also assist with those
60
updates.
61
It was recommended that prioritization should be added as a field for the map to be able to sort
62
and filter by (short-term, long-range, etc.).
63

64
Public comment was opened at 7:10 PM.
65

66
Bob Daigle asked when public comment is going to be received; the Chair explained that they
67
have been receiving comments throughout the process but that this is the first public hearing.
68
Mr. Daigle asked if there will be further public hearings.
69

70
Bill added that the Master Plan is a living document and can therefore be fluid and updated
71
after the initial official adoption still as well.
72
The Chair reviewed how this is the first comprehensive update in about 20 years, and explained
73
individual chapters have been updated since then and therefore they can continue to do
74
amendments in a similar way moving forward. It was also explained that the Zoning Board of
75
Adjustment and Capital Improvement Plan also are informed by the Master Plan.
76

77
Jeff agreed that it may be beneficial to have more time for the public to review the full draft.
78
It was confirmed that the draft website interface will be made be accessible to the public and
79
shared.
80

81
Bart confirmed that the regularly scheduled Planning Board meeting is August 11.
82

83
Kimberly Harris, 6 Lincoln Avenue, asked when the last rewrite was. It was confirmed to be in
84
2004, but reiterated there has been further updates and amendments to individual chapters. It
85
was also confirmed that the previous Master Plan is on the website if people wished to compare.
86
Ms. Harris continued to ask what the larger things being changed in the Master Plan are when
87
comparing the information.
88
The Chair further spoke to the past two years of work on the update, how each chapter had its
89
own separate subcommittee, and items that no longer applied or were no longer relevant were
90
removed. The draft for adoption includes editing for consistencies between chapters and
91
creating cohesiveness throughout the document.
92
Bill commented that it depends on when an individual member of the public is interested in for
93
what they overall may take away from the Master Plan.
94
Bart commented that links will be added to the department and Planning Board pages for
95
people to be able to review the draft website, and that the PDF versions have been posted for
96
review already. It was further explained that there are broad differences in chapters and
97
contents between the previous comprehensive update and this one.

3
Town Hall, 186 Main Street, Newmarket, NH 07/14/2026 Planning Board

98
Zach confirmed that there could be a list formulated of old versus new chapter names and the
99
different themes.
100

101
The Chair also noted that the Planning Board members and other board members will need to
102
be updated, while also noting previous members, and the different chapter subcommittee
103
members as well.
104

105
George Willant, 42 Schanda Drive, asked what the overall goal was for adopting the updated
106
Master Plan; the Chair noted that the original goal was Spring 2026.
107
Bart recommended that it would be advisable to continue the hearing to August for comments,
108
with the hope to adopt it at the next meeting.
109

110
Bill added that he would suggest the action items should be a prioritization for anyone in the
111
public that is reviewing the Master Plan.
112
Zach added that the overall vision should be reviewed by the public as well, and that the board
113
is otherwise comfortable with the document pending any public comments.
114
There was consensus that the August 11 continued hearing will guide when the final adoption
115
would be.
116
Justin added that he does not foresee any major adjustments as well, therefore hoping for
117
approval in August pending any minor changes.
118

119
Action
120
Motion:
Zach Shollar motioned to continue the public comments for the Master Plan
121

adoption to the regularly scheduled Planning Board meeting on August 11, 2026.
122
Second:
Bill Arcieri
123
Discussion: None
124
Vote:
Approved 6-0-0
125

126
b. Pursuant to RSA 676:4 and Section 2.02 Design Review of Appendix B - Site Plans of
127
the Municipal Code of the Town of Newmarket, New Hampshire, notice is hereby given
128
that a design review application, requested by applicants Altus Engineering and
129
Portsmouth Architects, representing Cheney East Company, will be reviewed by Planning
130
Board to discuss and provide input on a development concept for a property located at 14
131
Elm Street, Tax Map U2, Lot 245 in the Village Corridor-Center District. The first concept
132
proposes an apartment building with an 11,720 sf. footprint, comprising 20 dwelling units
133
with 25 parking spaces with associated utilities and infrastructure. The application is on
134
file in the Department of Planning and Community Development office located in the
135
Newmarket Town Hall with an address of 186 Main Street.
136
The Chair read the above into the record, and explained that this is a design review with non-
137
binding discussions. It will not be voted on, and is strictly a review meeting.
138
Jeff Goldknopf recused himself from the discussion.
139
Richard Desjardins, Portsmouth Architects, introduced himself with Mark Gianniny,
140
Portsmouth Architects, and Patrick Journeay, Altus Engineering. The plan being presented can
141
be found at: https://newmarketnh.portal.civicclerk.com/event/2436/files/attachment/7909.
142

143
Mr. Desjardins began by explaining that they were before the Board for a first design review in
144
February for the redevelopment, and this plan is an addendum to that submittal. All dimensional
145
reductions between the previous proposal and this proposal are provided in the documents
146
submitted, including the reduction of about 2000 SF to the building footprint. The history of the
147
site and neighborhood was reviewed with a previous two-story mill building extensively covering
148
the site and surrounding land, drawing architectural and design inspiration from that. The design

4
Town Hall, 186 Main Street, Newmarket, NH 07/14/2026 Planning Board

149
includes a brick star/elevator tower, and the building transitions to a mansard roof structure in
150
the rear of the site toward Washington Street to break up the façade and have the building
151
appear as separate multiple buildings. The revised design also preserves the largest and
152
healthiest tree along Elm Street. It was explained that the lot is about 17000 SF, substantially
153
larger than the minimum for the zone which is 3000 SF, which drives some of the relief
154
requests. It was added that the lot size can accommodate and warrants a larger building for
155
urban infill, with Nichols Avenue and Washington Street serving as the boundary to the R3
156
zoning district, which has also been identified in the proposed master plan as an area for zoning
157
reevaluation to encourage a variety of housing affordability and diversity.
158
Mr. Desjardins continued to review key changes to the design, as follows: the Washington
159
Street buildout request is eliminated; the parking garage is fully enclosed to conceal parking
160
within the structure along with bikes, trash, tenant storage and mechanical space systems; 10’
161
in building width has been removed to reduce the structure size; the pushing and pulling in the
162
building has been increased so that no flat portions exceed the maximum 50’ in length on Elm
163
Street and 100’ on Nichols Avenue; parking spaces have been reduced and provides one
164
parking space per unit; setbacks have been increased to provide more landscaping; there will
165
be a multi-functional bench to replace the current existing bus stop area; the project including
166
diverse unit sizes ranging from 488 SF studio to a 1450 SF two-bedroom unit; community-based
167
elements including a 1000 SF community rooftop deck for the building residents accessible by
168
elevator, a sharable office space on the second floor, and a lounge area on the third floor;
169
proposing a partial green roof to aid in stormwater retention and aid in the heat island effect;
170
both the flat roof and mansard roof portions on the project being below the max building height
171
of the neighboring zoning district to transition from the VC to R3 district; an overview that the
172
site is a two minute walk to Main Street and four minute walk to central downtown areas,
173
encouraging pedestrian activity of residents instead of vehicle traffic
174

175
Mr. Journeay further continued that since February, mrore survey information has been
176
collected in regards to drainage and sidewalks. They also met with Bart and Lyndsay to
177
discuss traffic, safety, and drainage elements. The current intent is to have vehicles enter the
178
site on Elm Street and exit on Washington Street. The current design will also suggest
179
relocation for crosswalks and rebuilding of ADA crosswalks, with landscaping proposed in
180
between the building and sidewalk/crosswalk areas. Stormwater discharge would be redirected
181
to the larger drainage pipe on Elm Street, and away from the current undersized pipe on Nichols
182
Avenue and Washington Street. It was reiterated that the proposed green roof would also aid in
183
slowing water flow. The utilities that will be proposed to connect in the site were also referenced.
184

185
Public comment opened at 8:05 PM.
186

187
Andrew Hart, 6 Lincoln Avenue, spoke to the property frontage on three streets; narrow streets
188
with sidewalks only on Nichols Avenue; current challenges with Lincoln Avenue being a dead-
189
end street as dump trucks have to back into the streets, and similar issue with plow trucks as
190
well. Commented that the neighborhood is mainly a cluster of single family homes, duplexes,
191
and colonial-type homes that have been converted into apartment units. Also commented on
192
parking issues, as most homes have two cars. Continued that the niehgborhood is of pedestrian
193
streets with lots of activity. Regarding drainage, commented that Washington Avenue frequently
194
floods, including in the winter when it floods and freezes. Disagrees with the proposed exit on
195
Washington Street. Further described neighborhood; spoke to Master Plan, Transportation
196
chapter calling for multi-modal streets which this development would go against, Disagrees that
197
this would add affordable housing. In terms of the Resiliency chapter, it is a flood-prone area
198
where this development would not help. Housing chapter highlights building in rural residential
199
district, and disagreed that the VCC district definition and goals aligns with this proposal.

5
Town Hall, 186 Main Street, Newmarket, NH 07/14/2026 Planning Board

200

201
Jennifer Whitten, 16 Nichols Avenue, described that she lived in the neighborhood when she
202
was in college and recently moved back. Spoke to the population density with about 40 dwelling
203
units currently on Nichols Avenue, where this would add another 20 units. Overwhelmed by
204
parking due to recreation activities, and especially when parking is full on Main Street. Trouble
205
for emergency vehicles to pass as well. Concerned with visibility for sight distance. Appreciate
206
historical information and details, but noted that there were not as many cars for cause of
207
concern previously. Spoke to community in the neighborhood, lots of children, economic
208
diversity, retirees, great range of different people. Concerned by the impact this will have on that
209
community, addition of cars, pollution with stormwater and air pollution. Questions regarding
210
impact to public safety, asked if four-plexes would be possible without impeding on sight-lines
211
as much. Echoed concern regarding plows. Disagreed that it is consistent with neighborhood.
212
Wondered what other proposal could support existing neighborhood instead of focusing on
213
future tenants.
214

215
Bill Mitchell, 2 Lincoln Avenue, introduced how he has lived in the neighborhood for six years.
216
Spoke to issues with trucks and maneuvering on the streets. Worried about only having one
217
parking space per unit and how additional cars would be supported, causing issues for
218
pedestrians and the police. Wants advancement and improvement, but believes this needs to be
219
looked at more carefully.
220

221
Richie Reeves, 8 Lincoln Avenue, reviewed that he has lived in neighborhood since 2019.
222
Spoke anecdotally regarding the neighborhood and the feeling of the town, worried about it
223
becoming like Portsmouth and not bringing together community, changing Newmarket
224
negatively.
225

226
Mike Mangan, owner of 10-12 Nichols Avenue, asked regarding the relief that would be needed
227
for this proposal, and also regarding parking in the area and where/if it is allowed on the streets
228
in the neighborhood.
229

230
Andrea McCurry, 13 ½ Nichols Avenue, spoke that she believes there is a more sensible way
231
to approach the property and the development, and agreed with issues with parking and narrow
232
roads, stating that the proposal does not fit in with the neighborhood and the area.
233

234
Alyssa Chase, 10 Nichols Avenue, agreed with the previous comments, spoke to previously
235
living in Portsmouth and staying in Newmarket for the community and welcoming feeling. Does
236
not like the design of the building, believes it would have a negative impact. Used to live on
237
Spring Street where there was one parking space per unit which was very hard to manage.
238

239
John Carmichael, 44 Elm Street, asked regarding the bus station and the bench. It was
240
confirmed that the bench would be covered. Spoke to how children wait at the bench for the
241
school bus. Added that Nichols Avenue has been on the historic district for unique housing;
242
commented that it would be a shame for the historicalness on the street to be overshadowed by
243
this new building.
244

245
Donald Pelletier, 42 Elm Street, asked if the Master Plan would inform the new development,
246
or if the development would have changes. It was clarified that the Master Plan is separate from
247
the Zoning Ordinance; Master Plan is general visioning whereas developments are under the
248
development regulations and zoning ordinance.
249

6
Town Hall, 186 Main Street, Newmarket, NH 07/14/2026 Planning Board

250
Brad Ritchie, 8 Washington Street, added the importance to carefully consider changes and
251
how it impacts the greater neighborhood and town. Spoke to previous proposals that had
252
previously been discussed.
253

254
Bob Daigle, 43 Elm Street, praised the plan but commented that if it could be reduced to
255
therefore better fit the neighborhood.
256

257
Brian Michaelis, 41 Elm Street, introduced himself as a resident since 1984, commented on an
258
environmental impact study for any proposal. Spoke to Rivermoor Landing history as well,
259
sewage system and infrastructure, existing system is dilapidated and does not believe it could
260
support this development. Commented on traffic in neighborhood as well and how this would
261
add to it. Traffic study also urged.
262

263
Andrea McCurry, asked regarding the existing white house and how it was previously being
264
renovated and why it is not being demolished.
265

266
Jennifer Whitten reiterated the question of what relief is being requested
267

268
Public comment closed at 8:45 PM.
269

270
Bart reviewed the relief being requested relative to the current zoning and design proposal.
271
There will be Special Use Permits needed from the Planning Board, but no variances are
272
needed from the Zoning Board of Adjustment based on the current design proposal. Explained
273
that the building width maximum is 50’ on Elm Street and 100’ on Nichols Avenue, which the
274
proposal exceeds and would require relief under the Special Use Permit. They are also
275
proposing more than the maximum number of units per site, which is 16, therefore needing relief
276
for that as well. The total units per building is also being exceeded. Building types are also listed
277
in the zoning ordinance where this would be a different type than allowed, so relief can then also
278
be requested through the Planning Board for that.
279
Bart continued to review the process. The proposal would next would go to the Technical
280
Review Committee (TRC), which is open to the public but does not require notice and is not
281
interactive with public comment. TRC will then submit a response letter to applicant after
282
meeting, which is addressed in the formal submittal to Planning Board. The design is also
283
reviewed by Town’s consulting engineers at that stage.
284
The Chair also reiterated that maximum units per building is 8 units for this zone. Therefore it
285
must meet the criteria of the Special Use Permit, which includes the building type. The Special
286
Use Permit is an administrative decision of the Planning Board, which gives the Board authority
287
to approve and modify.
288

289
Eric Weinrieb, Altus Engineering, commented regarding the design and the parking. State RSA
290
only requires one space per dwelling unit, and more than the state minimum cannot be
291
requested.
292
The Chair added that the zone also required no parking in the VCC zone, and therefore parking
293
cannot be mandated.
294

295
Mr. Mangan asked on which streets parking is allowed. The Board referred to the Town parking
296
ordinance for clarification.
297

298
Bart continued to review the staff report, which can be reviewed at: https://newmarketnh.
299
portal.civicclerk.com/event/2436/files/attachment/7933. With the current proposal, the building
300
length on Elm Street and Nichols Avenue would require relief. Relief would also be needed for

7
Town Hall, 186 Main Street, Newmarket, NH 07/14/2026 Planning Board

301
exceeding the 16-unit maximum units for a lot in the zone. The criteria for granting relief was
302
reviewed under section 32-45 (f)(2).
303

304
Regarding section 32-45(f)(2), the Chair confirmed with the applicant that it is not a townhouse
305
development.
306
Mr. Desjardins noted that a fiscal impact study and market analysis would completed after this
307
stage.
308
Discussion continued to the Special Use Permit requiring a community space as the focal point;
309
Mr. Desjardins pointed to the community rooftop deck, landscaping areas around street fronts,
310
shared office spaces, and the development being direct walking distance to downtown.
311
Zach asked for clarification that it is focused on residents of development; this was confirmed.
312

313
Bart reviewed intent of district as written in ordinance. Zach commented how it is on boundary
314
of the districts and also gateway to neighborhood, and that it could better meet the transition of
315
the neighborhoods with that in mind.
316
Mr. Desjardins commented on the breaking up of the façade in order to try to meet that goal,
317
that if the building were to be separated then it would meet the proposed lengths, and also that
318
they are trying to meet the different abutting zoning areas with respect to the height.
319
Discussion ensued regarding if the lot could hypothetically be subdividable in order to meet the
320
regulations, which would also require firewalls. The parking opening would not be allowed,
321
therefore requiring more curb cuts and likely requiring a reduction in parking spaces for
322
maneuverability. Overall, the same building would not be able to be achieved if it was
323
subdivided, hypothetically.
324
Mr. Weinrieb added how additional stairs and elevators would also be needed in the
325
hypothetical scenario, causing increased infrastructure costs.
326

327
Discussion continued to the previous proposal with three buildings; Bill confirmed that less relief
328
would be needed for that proposal, as relief would not be needed for length of building.
329
Mr. Desjardins spoke to February meeting and the board not agreeing with the height of the
330
buildings in that proposal, as well as that proposal having more impervious surfaces.
331

332
Zach spoke further to design and the amount of units, pointing to the courtyard style
333
developments that the district envisioned. Mr. Desjardins also spoke to the minimum lot size
334
and the property exceeding that, explaining that the lot lends to a building of the proposed size.
335

336
Bart referred back to special use permit for exceeding 16 units and the requirement for a focal
337
point as a common/social space. Further discussion ensued regarding different scenarios and
338
design context.
339

340
Zach commented further on location of lot and meeting the purpose of district, and mitigation of
341
impacts that have been commented on tonight.
342

343
Jane also added concerns regarding the design, noting that the design does not fit the
344
environment, being familiar with the neighborhood and having traffic concerns observationally.
345

346
Bill added concerns with density, and parking needs. The Chair reiterated that it could be built
347
with no parking based on regulations. Bill continued to express issues with the proposed
348
density and seeing an adverse impact, noting that he could agree if it was reduced to 16 units
349
and did not exceed that maximum.
350

8
Town Hall, 186 Main Street, Newmarket, NH 07/14/2026 Planning Board

351
Justin noted that there is a market for people that rent without readily provided parking spaces.
352
Noted concerns with flooding and driving in the neighborhood with the roads, and appreciates
353
effort with incorporating parking.
354

355
Zach further commented on the sidewalk; advised extending sidewalk, and to have a drop off
356
location and trash receptacles relocation. Mr. Desjardins agreed that it could be explored to
357
relocate the trash. Commented on traffic, trying to keep traffic off of narrower streets. Items
358
would help alleviate the relief request.
359

360
Mr. Desjardins concluded that the proposal is still a residential use in residential neighborhood.
361
Mr. Weinrieb explained that formalizing crosswalks and sidewalks better through the proposal
362
will increase safety and correct drainage, and that it is ADA accessible. They will be redirecting
363
drainage to Elm Street to reduce public safety issue of flooding and icing in the winter as has
364
been expressed. They will change the turning radius as well. Commented that they could
365
explore adding a sidewalk along Nichols Avenue if it is preferred to add that for public safety
366
benefit, but that this would take away some landscaping.
367

368
Bill asked for confirmation regarding stormwater; Mr. Weinrieb explained that they are only
369
adding 2000 SF of additional impervious surface than what is currently on the site.
370

371
Discussion returned to the building type and if it is consistent with the zone. It was noted that the
372
proposed type is more in line with a large Main Street building typology.
373

374
Zach agreed that it meets the VCC zone, and sees that they are trying to blend it in with
375
neighborhood and typologies, but on a bigger scale. Bill agreed as well.
376

377
Discussion continued to review the setback and structure height consistency further. Sheet A9
378
was reviewed with it noted that the proposal is consistent as the building structure gets closer to
379
the adjacent lots. It was noted that it is taller than adjacent lots by about 4-5’ from peak to peak.
380
It was also noted that providing the specific number will help clarify that further.
381
For the building length exceeding on Nichols Avenue and Elm Street, it was further explained
382
that exceeding the length is due to trying to fit the parking.
383
Zach spoke to the impact of the size and building length relative to other impacts of the
384
development.
385

386
The Board thanked the applicants and the public in conclusion of the discussion.
387

388
5.

New/Old Business
389
a. Committee Reports
390
Consensus that there was nothing critical from committee reports at this time.
391

392
b. Planner’s Report
393
Bart reported that the Town received a grant for Schanda Park planning. Ivy Vann will likely
394
coming for presentation regarding HOP grant updates in September. A joint board and
395
committee is trying to be planned to gather feedback and input for the wayfinding project, noting
396
that members should keep an eye out for further communication. The CIP committee will start
397
meeting in August. The Rosa-Folletts Brook project is on track for closing in October. The 200
398
New Road project is working through state process. A proposal for 37 Exeter Road will likely
399
come before the Board soon, as well as one for 41 Exeter Road. A proposal at 3 North Main
400
Street is pending. There will be a stormwater review for 5 Chapel Street likely in September.
401

9
Town Hall, 186 Main Street, Newmarket, NH 07/14/2026 Planning Board

402
Motion to extend the meeting close time past 10:00 PM made by Zach Shollar.
403
Motion seconded by Bill Arcieri.
404
Motion passed 6-0-0.
405

406
Bart continued that relief is going to be sought from the ZBA for 11 Creighton St, and then there
407
will be a BLA request before the Planning Board. There will be a goal setting agenda for the
408
Board planned soon as well.
409

410
c. Other Business
411
The Chair commented that members need to be careful posting anything on social media as
412
active board members regarding any proposals before the Board.
413

414
6.

Adjourn

415
Action
416
Motion:
Jane Ford moved to adjourn the meeting at 10:02 PM.
417
Second:
Justin Glazebrook
418
Discussion: None
419
Vote:
Approved 6-0-0
420

421
**************************************************************************************************
422

423
Respectfully submitted,
424
Bridgette Grotheer
425
Land Use Administrator
426
DCAT:
427
https://videoplayer.telvue.com/player/XSekkdEeRsk0JHQVHAvKJVka7_5VjxKP/videos
428