NH Muni WatchStatewide meeting record

All towns · coos-county

July 20, 2026

Representative Tierney moved, seconded by Representative Tremblay, to approve May 18, 2026 meeting minutes; approved unanimously by voice vote. Regarding the $204 million nursing home project, CDFA email clarified inclusion in the state plan does not guarantee funding. The RFQ for architect/engineer qualifications closes August 7, 2026. A site must be identified by October 30, 2026, with construction beginning spring 2027. The RHTF grant application deadline is September 1, 2026. Public petitions requested keeping the West Stewartstown facility open. Durkin moved, seconded by Tierney, to approve second quarter Coös County financials totaling $20,472,338 expenditures; approved 7-0. Tremblay moved, seconded by Durkin, to approve Unincorporated Places financials totaling $374,927 expenditures; approved 7-0. Next meetings are October 19 and December 7, 2026. Source: https://www.cooscountynh.gov/0720pa.pdf?t=202607280830520

Document

R:\Linda Harris\Delegation\2026 Minutes\0720.docx 
 
1 
Coös County Delegation 
Quarterly Meeting  
July 20, 2026, at 10:00 a.m. 
North Country Resource Center 
629 Main Street Lancaster, NH 
 
Present:  Representatives Arnold Davis, Chair; Mike Ouellet, Vice Chair; Lori Korzen, Clerk; Sean 
Durkin; Seth King; James Tierney and Marc Tremblay.  Also Present:  Commissioners Tom Brady, 
Raymond Gorman, and Robert Théberge; County Administrator Mark Brady; Superintendent Ben 
Champagne; Director of Finance Carrie Klebe; Nursing Home Administrator Louise Belanger; 
Acting Nursing Hospital Supervisor Ashley Hodge; Assistant Finance Director Christine Labelle;  HR 
Coordinator Morgan DeBlois; Sheriff Keith Roberge; Deputy Bert vonDohrmann; Ray Berthiaume & 
Andy Schafermeyer , UNH Cooperative Extension; Bob Gargano, Town of Gorham; Administrative 
Assistant Linda Harris & members of the public.    
 
Chairman Davis called the meeting to order at 10:031a.m. and led the Pledge of Allegiance.   
 
The roll was called by the Clerk, Representative Korzen.  There were seven members present. 
Representative Morency was excused.    
 
Review & Approval of the Minutes of the May 18, 2026, quarterly meeting:  A motion was made by 
Representative Tierney, seconded by Representative Tremblay to approve the minutes of the May 
18, 2026, quarterly meeting.  The motion was approved unanimously by voice vote. 
 
Hearing of the Public: 
Dan Dagesse distributed the following talking points to the Delegation and Commissioners: 
 
Here are some talking points for the Coös County Nursing Home Project and some timelines: 
 
 
1. The original nursing home proposal by the Coös County officials was completed by Barry Dunn 
on October 9th, 2025 
 
 
2. The Coös County Nursing Home proposal by Dunn identified Colebrook as the site for a Nursing 
home. 
 
 
3. Governor and Executive Council contract to accept and expend $204 million on March 4, 2026, 
meeting. 
 
 
4. A special Governor and Council meeting was held on March 13th, 2026, 
 
 "THE CONTRACTOR IS AUTHORIZED TO ENTER INTO THE FOLLOWING SOLE SOURCE LETTER OF 
INTENT WITH CDFA TO CONTRACT WITH COOS COUNTY TO RENOVATE THE FORMER COLEBROOK 
ACADEMY BUILDING TO REPLACE THE WEST STEWARTSTOWN COOS COUNTY NURSING HOME." 
 
 
5. Somewhere at the end of April or early May, negotiation with contractor stalled. NO FOLLOW UP 
BY COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR WAS MADE WITH CONTRACTOR. 
 
 
6. At the request of the County on May 8, 2026, CDFA approved the County's LOI Amendment on 
May 9, 2026. 
 
 
7. The LOI Amendment stated the Coos County Nursing project would request an RFP for Different 

 
R:\Linda Harris\Delegation\2026 Minutes\0720.docx 
 
2 
locations county wide. Funding for consultant for RFP would be released later. 
 
 
8. On June 24, 2026 Councilor Kenny asked Go-North Director Donnalee Lozeau in an Email if an 
RFP could be avoided for the Colebrook Project. A same day reply from Go-North Director 
revealed " I do know if it is the Colebrook Academy as proposed in Our approved CMS award-
there is no need for any additional steps for approval. 
 
 There is no reason negotiations with the owner of the Colebrook Academy cannot Proceed from 
the Go-North or CMS standpoint. (see below email)." 
 
 
9. On June 25, Go-North Director further clarified " I have confirmed my response below And your 
summary is correct! Including your conclusion on what a new location means For approvals, at 
a minimum it will need to be APPROVED BY CMS. As you know the Council does want to 
approve sole-source, not certain if they would forgo this based on The County and the 
supported need. That is as you know, not my call!" 
 
 
10. On June 26th, Councilor Kenny asked Go-North Director by email, whether the funding for a 
rehabilitated nursing home would be available for a five-year period? The answer Is that CMS 
has approved the full Go-North budget for the first budget period award As OBLIGATED. This 
means NH has already met its September 2026 CMS deadline. 
 
To program the funding. The COÖS COUNTY NURSING HOME PROJECT BEING BUDGETED IN PERIOD 1 IS 
DUE TO THE EXPEDIENCY AND SOLE SOURCE OF THE PROJECT. Ideally, the total amount for nursing 
home needs to be spent by September 2027 or could possibly go into the Budget period 2 if the feds 
obligate the funding for That budget period. AN EXTENSION WOULD HAVE TO BE REQUESTED. IT ALSO 
COULD JEOPARDIZE FUNDING FOR THE NURSING HOME PROJECT IF THE MONEY IS NOT THERE FOR 
BUDGET PERIOD 2. 
 
Mr. Dagesse questioned the purpose of the RFP since the project is already approved and 
taxpayer money is being spent. 
 
Chairman Davis noted that it was an RFQ (request for qualifications) that had been published 
to secure an architectural/engineering firm to help the county evaluate potential sites.  The 
RFQ would close on August 7, 2026. He said the Rural Healthcare Transformation Funding 
(RHTF) is secured and Coös will not be losing the monies. 
 
Mr. Dagesse inquired if the Board would be willing to meet with CDFA.   
 
Dan Hebert, Colebrook, reported that he had met with the County Administrator to discuss the 
possibility of the old academy becoming a nursing home.  He agreed to front the architect with 
the understanding that he would put up the shell structure. The remainder of the project would 
go out to competitive bidders.  He did not agree to a clause that if something happened to the 
federal grant, he would lose $6 million. 
 
The County Administrator said that he would not discuss publicly the negotiations between 
the County and Mr. Hebert.  He distributed a copy of an email from CDFA and a copy of the 
RFQ.  He added that mischaracterization does not help the situation at hand. 
 
Vice Chair Ouellet read the email: 
 
 

 
R:\Linda Harris\Delegation\2026 Minutes\0720.docx 
 
3 
 
Hi Mark, 
 
Thank you for your question. I am happy to clarify the status of the application and the GO-
NORTH Rural Community Health Infrastructure Program (RCHIP) process. 
 
 
CDFA understands that the County's project was identified in the State's application to 
CMS as a potential infrastructure investment aligned with the goals of the Rural Health 
Transformation Plan. However, that action did not constitute an award of GO-NORTH 
RCHIP funding the project. Funding awards will be made through a competitive application 
process administered by CDFA during Budget Period 1. Applications for Budget Period 1 are 
due on September 1, 2026. 
 
 
Based on the information provided to date and our review of the program priorities, the 
County's project appears to be well-aligned with the objectives and eligibility requirements 
for Budget Period 1. Coos County submitted the Request for Eligibility Determination to get 
started in the CDFA system and we expect Coos to be invited to complete a full application 
during the Budget Period 1 application period shortly. 
 
 
It is important to note that an eligibility determination is not a funding commitment. The 
full application process will evaluate project readiness, scope, budget, community impact, 
and alignment with the State's Rural Health Transformation goals before funding decisions 
are made. At this time, there is no awarded funding that the County would lose by not 
beginning construction immediately, although applicants are encouraged to continue 
advancing project planning and readiness activities, so they are prepared for the application 
and review process. 
 
 
I hope this helps clarify the distinction between inclusion in the State's plan, eligibility for 
the program, and a future funding award. Please feel free to share this information with 
residents, and don't hesitate to reach out if additional questions arise. 
 
 
Best regards, Rebecca Boisvert 
 
And the RFQ: 
 
REQUEST FOR ENGINEER/ARCHITECT/CONSTRUCTION MANAGER QUALIFICATIONS 
Coös County, New Hampshire 
 
Coös County, New Hampshire requests Engineer/Architect/Construction Manager Qualifications 
from qualified firms for a Rural Health Transformation Grant Project. Coös County, New Hampshire 
owns and operates a Nursing Hospital in West Stewartstown, NH. The County is applying for a 
Rural Health Transformation Grant to relocate their Nursing Hospital in that area or possibly 
renovate the existing building. The project is to look at up to 4 possible locations, existing buildings 
and the current location, to determine the feasibility of the sites, preliminary design and cost 
estimates for the nursing hospital project. 
This is an equal opportunity/affirmative action agency. All qualified firms will receive consideration 
without regard to race, color, religion, creed, age, sex, or national origin. Consultant selection will 

 
R:\Linda Harris\Delegation\2026 Minutes\0720.docx 
 
4 
be qualifications based. 
 
Information: Louise Belanger louise.belanger@cooscountynh.gov (603)344-7505 
 
Please submit an electronic qualifications with project understanding, detailed scope of services and 
applicant experience by August 7, 2026. 
 
The County Administrator provided the project timeline once again.   
 
He said that the County had engaged Berry Dunn in 2024 and 2025 to analyze the county nursing 
home operations and footprint.  Berry Dunn (BD) considered all options including maintaining the 
existing county footprint with a new facility in W. Stewartstown (on county property on Back Pond 
Road) and consolidating Berlin Nursing Home (CCNH) and W. Stewartstown Nursing Home 
(WSNH) to one facility in Groveton.  The BerryDunn report found that demographically and 
financially Coös County can support two nursing homes.  The cost of consolidation to Groveton 
would have been around $60 million +/- for a 125-bed facility. The debt financing, however, was too 
costly and negated its viability. Instead, BD recommended an addition to the Berlin facility of $5-6 
million which would allow for the reconfiguration of 100 rooms to include ten private pay suites, 
which would help with the finances.  Additionally, they analyzed constructing a new 75-bed facility 
on Back Pond Road at a cost of $30+ million with 60% ($18-19 million) financed by debt. Financially 
it would be viable, and they stressed that that condition of the WSNH was negatively impacting the 
census, efficiencies and profitability. He said that the consensus is that the current WSNH cannot 
be renovated while the residents reside in the building.  Additionally, there was no appetite by the 
Board of Commissioners to bond $18-19 million for a new WSNH facility. 
 
Then in August and September of 2025 the County learned of the Rural Healthcare Transformation 
Funds (RHTF).  Councilors Kenney and Stephen held an informational roundtable in Berlin in 
August, and the Governor and her Administration held another in Littleton in September. It was 
from those meetings that the county decided to submit a proposal for CCNH based on an 
understanding of what the funds could be used for. The county had concluded that they could not 
be used for the W. Stewartstown situation.  Thus, the country submitted a proposal for $7.8 million 
for CCNH on October 1, 2025.  The County was then contacted by the New Hampshire Association 
of Counties and asked if the county would be interested in submitting a proposal for WSNH if it 
could find a facility to modify/renovate.  And the proposal had to be submitted within 7 days.  The 
County Administrator contacted Commissioner Gorman since he is the Commissioner for that 
district and inquired if he knew of any buildings.  Commissioner Gorman said he had the perfect 
building -- The Colebrook Academy.  That is how the Country got to the Colebrook Academy and 
subsequently submitted a proposal on October 8, 2025.  He said that proposal was for a 
transaction of $23 million where the County would buy the property for $600,000 and the Rural 
Healthcare Transformation Funds were to pay for the rest.  The state decided to include the WSNH 
proposal in its submission to the federal government instead of Berlin.  He said that based on 
discussions with the NH Community Development Finance Authority (CDFA), the transaction was 
changed whereby the County would buy a new shell structure at the Colebrook Academy for the 
70-bed facility.  That was done because the RHTF could not be used to pay for an addition – they 
can only be used on the existing footprint.  Therefore, once the shell was complete, the federal 
funds would be used to build out the structure.   Subsequently, the executive council approved the 
project on March 16, 2026. 
 

 
R:\Linda Harris\Delegation\2026 Minutes\0720.docx 
 
5 
The Administrator said that West Stewartstown residents attended the April 15, 2026, 
commissioners meeting and expressed concerns about the project – they did not want to lose the 
nursing home and questioned the viability of the academy site because of its age and historical 
significance.  The Administrator said that the Colebrook Chronicle article did a good job in 
explaining the culmination of events that led to the Board reassessing the process.  
 
The County, in consultation with the CDFA, decided to pursue a new process.  That was the 
purpose in filing the Amendment to the Letter of Intent in May.  The County would apply for a 
technical assistance grant from the CDFA for up to $50,000 for engineering, architectural and 
construction management assistance.  There would then be an assessment of potential sites to 
determine their viability.  He said that the Colebrook Academy and the WSNH would be reviewed 
and the county hoped to identify a few other possible sites in the Groveton – Colebrook area.    
 
The RFQ was posted on Tuesday, July 14, 2026, and closes August 7, 2026.  The site must be 
identified by October 30, 2026.  An RFP for construction will be issued after that (TBD) so that 
construction can begin in the spring of 2027.  The County’s application for the RHTF program 
must be submitted by September 1, 2026, even though a site will not be identified by then.   
 
Once the sites have been assessed, the Board of Commissioners will have a review process of 
those sites that is transparent and provides for public input.    
 
Representative Tierney noted that an architect is a requirement from the federal government. 
 
Representative Ouellet noted that Mr. Dagesse is always ready to assist the North Country and 
not looking to get rich.  Mr. Dagesse reported that he had set up a meeting with CDFA in 
Concord and two of the Commissioners had agreed to attend.   
 
Commissioner Gorman stated that the Board has to meet with the CDFA.  He had made that 
clear at the Commissioners meeting of July 17, 2026.   
 
Chairman Brady noted that he was confused about the proposed meeting as he knew nothing 
of a meeting with the Governor’s legal counsel and the CDFA and questioned other 
Commissioners working behind the back of the Chair.  He noted that at Friday’s 
Commissioners’ meeting (July 17, 2026) he stated that the CDFA meeting should be a public 
meeting.  He was perplexed by the ongoing process to set up a meeting in Concord.  The Chair 
said that he would not attend a meeting in Concord and the public needs to be included so 
that the residents who are being affected by this decision can hear about it directly.  He said 
the public asked the Board of Commissioners for options and that is what the Board is doing.    
Chairman Davis agreed that any meeting with CDFA must be held in Stewartstown or 
Colebrook. 
 
Lynn Dorman, representing the West Stewartstown residents, presented the Chair with a 
petition signed by local residents.  The petition reads as follows:   
 
 
We, the undersigned residents of Coös County, respectfully urge local and state decision-makers to 
keep the existing nursing home in West Stewartstown open and operating at its current location 
rather than pursuing the costly, disruptive, and uncertain process of acquiring and rehabilitating a 
different building elsewhere. 

 
R:\Linda Harris\Delegation\2026 Minutes\0720.docx 
 
6 
This facility has served our community since its establishment in 1932, first as a general hospital and 
nursing home, and since the early 1970s as a dedicated nursing home. 
 
Using available federal funds to renovate and improve the current facility would be a more practical, 
fiscally responsible, and less disruptive investment than spending public resources to acquire and 
rehabilitate a new building elsewhere. 
 
We therefore call on the appropriate officials, administrators, and community leaders to take 
immediate action to preserve the existing nursing home, maintain services in the current building, 
and support any improvements necessary to update the facility to reflect 
current state statutes and regulations. 
 
She also noted that the Colebrook site has 2 +/- acres whereas Stewartstown has several lots 
totaling over 900 acres. 
 
Wayne Dorman, Pittsburg, stated that he hopes that the petitions are used as a tool to make 
the right decision.  He is happy that the West Stewartstown facility is being re-evaluated.  It 
could be too expensive to renovate.  The report will provide the information needed.  He, too, 
provided petitions from 285 individuals, which included 28 Vermont residents.  He added that 
Vermont Medicaid residents pay double what is received by the NH Medicaid residents. 
 
Rick Samson, Stewartstown, stated that the Delegation represents the Coös County residents.  
The current footprint of the West Stewartstown facility does not match the academy’s 
footprint.  Colebrook stands to lose $1million in taxes if the nursing home moves there.  He 
also stated that Colebrook representatives should recuse themselves from voting.  Groveton 
is a central location, and Lancaster is the county seat.  He asked both of the boards 
(Delegation and Commissioners) to consider building a new facility in Lancaster or Groveton 
and consolidate staff to one facility.  He said the division in the county needs to stop. 
 
Representative King asked if Mr. Samson had read the BerryDunn (BD) report as the numbers 
showed that two nursing homes work in Coös County. 
 
Chairman Davis stated that Coös County is geographically spread out – 20% of the land area 
of the state and 2% of the population. He noted that the BD report is an independent analysis.  
The RFQ will help determine the best place and the RHTF do not allow us to build a new 
facility.  He said it is important to keep the facility in the northern part of Coös County. 
 
Representative Durkin stated that the numbers do not make sense.  How is a $23 million 
facility viable when it did not make sense to build a $60-65 million facility. Chairman Davis 
replied that the $65 million was an estimated cost for consolidating both nursing homes into 
one larger facility in Groveton.   
 
The County Administrator stated that the BD report showed that a new W. Stewartstown 
facility could support itself.  He said they modeled a scenario for a new 75 bed facility on Back 
Pond Road in W. Stewartstown.  Dan Hebert had estimated a cost of $32+ million, and the 
projection assumed a scenario of 60/40 split whereby the County would bond $19 million and 
$13 million would come from grants.  He said that if bonding $19 million worked then bonding 
$6 million should work.    
 

 
R:\Linda Harris\Delegation\2026 Minutes\0720.docx 
 
7 
Toby Owen, Pittsburg, provided the Delegation with signed petitions from the Town of 
Pittsburg. 
 
Allen Coats, Stewartstown, stated that the Delegation were representatives of its 
constituents.  They are elected to speak for them; not make decisions for them.  He asked that 
they consider what the people want.  Now, the county wants to send its inmates to Grafton.  
Grafton is very fortunate.  Several people want West Stewartstown to run the county farm and 
the academy building to go back to being the Colebrook Academy. 
 
Review & Approval of the Financial Statements of Coös County and of the Unincorporated Places 
for the period ended June 30, 2026. 
 
Director of Finance Carrie Klebe began the review of the Coös County Financials.  The total 
expenditures for the period ending June 30, 2026, was $20,472,338 or 28% expended.  Total 
revenues for the period ending June 30, 2026, were $17,610,583 or 24% received.  There were no 
questions.  A motion was made by Representative Durkin, seconded by Representative Tierney to 
approve the second quarter Coös County Financials for the period ended June 30, 2026.  The 
motion was approved by roll call 7-0. 
 
The Director of Finance continued with the review of Unincorporated Places’ second quarter 
financials.  The total expenditures for the period ending June 30, 2026, was $374,927 or 25% 
expended.  Total revenues for the period ending June 30, 2026, were $586,468 or 38% received.  
There were no questions.   
 
A motion was made by Representative Tremblay, seconded by Representative Durkin to approve 
the second quarter Unincorporated Places Financials for the period ended June 30, 2026.  The 
motion was approved by roll call 7-0. 
 
Old Business.  There was no old business to discuss. 
 
New Business.  There was no new business. 
 
Subcommittee Reports.  There were no reports. 
 
Any other business.  None. 
 
Dates of upcoming meetings:   
• 
Monday, October 19, 2026 @ 10:00 a.m. in Lancaster 
• 
Monday, December 7, 2026 @ 10:00 a.m. in West Stewartstown (Reorganizational Meeting) 
 
A motion was made by Representative Tierney, seconded by Representative Durkin to adjourn the 
meeting at 11:37 a.m. 
 
Respectfully submitted, 
 
 
 
Representative Lori Korzen, Clerk